|
|
|
Virginia Tech 2006 Preview Further Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
CollegeFootballNews.com Posted Jul 31, 2006
|
|
Virginia Tech Hokies
Preview 2006 Further Analysis
|
1st and Ten – Look out –
Intimidator. Physical presence. Hitter. So many different
‘words’ to define rover Aaron Rouse. Realistically, the word
that coaches use about a guy like Rouse is probably the most
fitting, but it’s not printable. Let’s just say that when a
ball carrier is in Rouse’s area code, said ball carrier better
have his head on a swivel. The former linebacker still carries
around some pent up linebacker anger when he’s on the field, but
he’s the presence in the middle who keeps receivers from running
across the middle free of charge, so to speak. But, Rouse’s
four interceptions show that he’s a true rover/strong safety and
will be so when he goes to the next level in 2007. But, in
2006, Rouse is as central a figure for this Hokie defense as
anyone, including the talented linebacking corps featuring Vince
Hall and Xavier Adibi. Although he hits like a ton of bricks,
his ability to play both pass and run is the key aspect of
Rouse’s game. He finished last year with 77 tackles, putting
him third on the team behind Hall and James Anderson. There’s
some talk that Rouse may end up moving back to the outside
backer position next to Hall and Adibi, which may take advantage
of his quickness in blitz packages coming off the edge or
shooting the B/C gaps to get pressure on the QB. It won’t
matter what position he plays, coaches will still refer to him
as a mother, oops sorry. Just look out when #36 is on the
prowl.
2nd and Seven – No drama –
No individual overtly goes out of his way to create drama.
In some instances, drama just follows people for whatever
reason. That was the career of Virginia Tech QB Marcus Vick in
a nutshell – nothing but drama. Even when times were good, he
drew an inordinate amount of attention to himself – the West
Virginia ‘salute’ comes to mind. On the field of play, Vick
seemed to rely on his natural ability such that he didn’t pick
up what defenses were doing to stop him. Consequently, when he
faced an equally talented defense, he was in trouble (Miami
game, anyone?). But, Vick is gone and that might be a win-win
situation for all involved. Sean Glennon isn’t the physical
specimen that Vick was, and he might not be a guy who can create
magic with his feet on scrambles. However, Glennon ought to
have a solid understanding of the offense and has plenty of
weapons to spread the ball around. This team doesn’t need 300
yards passing and 125 rushing every week; it needs consistency,
it needs to be effectively managed and it needs no drama.
Glennon should fit that bill.
3rd and Three – A Royal pain?
– The Hokie receiving corps is deep and talented. Any one
of these receivers can hurt a defense any given Saturday, but
Eddie Royal is the one guy who could be the dagger in your heart
every time he touches the ball. Make that should be. As a true
freshman, Royal gave the Hokies a weapon who could stretch the
field no matter where he lined up. In 2005, though, he seemed
to be more afterthought than integral part of the offense. That
has to change in 2006. No offense meant to David Clowney, Josh
Morgan, Justin Harper or Josh Hyman, but Royal, when healthy,
can be the ultimate game changer. Although comparing him to
former FSU great Peter Warrick is a bit of stretch, his running
style when he gets the ball in his hands is reminiscent of the
former Nole. If only he could have a Warrick-type effect (sans
a Dillards trip or two) in 2006, the Hokie offense would be a
pain in some ACC backsides.
4th
and One – Chip on their shoulder – At the 2004 ACC media
days, the media was asked to rank the 11 teams in the ACC, the
first year in the conference for Frank Beamer’s Hokies.
Consequently, the Hokies weren’t happy with the bottom half of
the conference prediction and they eventually used that slight
to motivate them to shock the world (and of course, the one CFN
threw at them which they displayed on their bulletin board
proudly). Their answer to the naysayers? They won the 2004 ACC
championship. Every week, they found a different and
unique way to win. The comeback at Georgia Tech.
The physical smash mouth battle down in Miami. They won. As a
team. No stars. No prima donnas. One team. One mission.
Last year, they seemed to lose that sense of purpose. Watching
them in the ACC championship game last year, it was quite
evident how much this team ebbed and flowed on emotion. When
FSU made their run in the third quarter, the Hokies looked as
though they just as soon head to Atlantic Beach and catch a late
nightcap at Ragtime. But, when they got back in the game, the
fire was back and the Hokies almost pulled off a huge comeback
in the fourth quarter. It was an interesting team, to say the
least, yet one that many thought underachieved. Consequently,
the 2006 squad needs the emotion (on an upswing, of course) of
the 2005 team and the chip on the shoulder attitude of the 2004
team. The Hokies thrived on that “us against the world”
mentality in 2004, and they need it back. Although they’re not
being picked to finish in the bottom half of the ACC in 2006, a
championship isn’t exactly being predicted either. Perfect.
Absolutely perfect.
|
|
|
|
|
|