Click Here to Email This Story to a Friend Click Here for a Printer Friendly Version
Scout.com RSS Feeds 
5 Thoughts - Tressel is right, so is Urban

CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Dec 4, 2006

Jim Tressel was right not to vote, but not like you think. Urban is right to want a playoff, a plus one is needed, & more in the latest 5 Thoughts.


Five Thoughts: Preseason | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4
Week 5 | Week 6 |
Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11
Week 12 | Week 13


Vote early, vote often, or just don't ruffle feathers.

By Pete Fiutak   
1.  Ohio State head coach Jim Tressel decided not to cast a vote in the final Coaches' Poll to avoid a conflict of interests. He didn't want to give the appearance of being a Big Ten homer if he voted for Michigan, and he didn't want the backlash from the conference if he had voted for Florida. While many are going to scream about this in some way, Tressel is right, but it's not just because he didn't cast a vote for the bowl season.

The Coaches Poll is not only a sham and a farce, with most of the "voters" turning out to be sports information directors and assistants to the coaches who aren't able to know enough about the world of college football, but it's also a huge conflict of interests from day one of the voting process.

Florida head coach Urban Meyer admitted that he had seen Michigan and Ohio State play once all year; when they played each other. Obviously no voting coach on East Coast time has seen most of the Pac 10 teams, Hawaii or Boise State play all season long, but they're supposed to have an informed opinion on them. It's not fair to the coaches, the players, or to college football, and Tressel's non-vote also proves that it's just not right.

How can coaches not have their own self-interest at heart? Of course they're going to vote for the teams in their own leagues because the not only know them the best, but also because it makes wins over them look better.

The entire voting process has to be done away with. Use a committee, NCAA basketball tournament selection style, to go over the teams and be held accountable week after week, use the computers more, and make this right once and for all.

What's good for the Urban is good for the Lloyd  

By Pete Fiutak   
2
.  Everything is always bad when it happens to you.

All the campaigning and politicking by urban Meyer to get his team into the national title game didn't really matter, it's not like the coaches and Harris Poll voters have any beef with Lloyd Carr and Michigan, but he was right in saying the system needs a playoff overhaul. Now that Carr and Michigan got the short end of the stick, he's predictably calling for a change to how things work.

What if the situations were reversed?

What if Florida was number two all year and got lapped by Michigan? Would the arguments be the same from both sides? If you believe something's wrong, then fight for it no matter what side it favors. If you think there should be a playoff, then fight for it no matter what. To Meyer's credit, he has always been a proponent of change, and now it's time all the coaches come aboard. If one team gets the shaft, then you have to acknowledge that it could eventually happen to you.

Alright coaches, here's the deal. Either you put it in writing that your are officially casting your vote and your idea for a playoff of some sort, or you lose your whining privileges if and when you get screwed.

P ... L ... U ... S ... O ... N ... E  

By Richard Cirminiello
3.
Two words. One rather simple solution. Plus one. Say it with me, p-l-u-s o-n-e. I have long been a proponent of pitting the four best teams in the country together (1 vs. 4, 2 vs. 3) in BCS bowl games with the two winners squaring off a week later for the national championship, but never more so than right now. Sure, I believe Florida belongs in Glendale, but am I 100% certain that the Gators, and not Michigan, are the second best team in the country? Heck no. No one is after both programs from power conferences finished with one loss against a ranked opponent. The real shame about this year's edition of the BCS quandary is that we'll never know which team is truly better because they'll never face each other on the field. They'll never play on the field, despite the fact that the BCS added a fifth game this year that seemingly set the stage for a plus one format, a mini-playoff that wouldn't alter the integrity of the current bowl structure, but would have brought us light years closer to common sense. But no, common sense has rarely been the hallmark of this system. Instead, we're left with endless debates, mythical comparisons and a stadium's worth of questions. Is Florida better than Michigan? Maybe. Maybe not. Had they been able to settle that debate in the 2 vs. 3 game of a plus one format, we'd actually be able to resolve this argument where it belongs--on the field.

Time to ditch the limtations

By
Matthew Zemek
4
.
While conference champions should have to play in national title games, it's also true that conferences should not have a two-team limit for BCS at-large selections in non-title games.

Arkansas, Wisconsin and Auburn all did more than Notre Dame did this season, but because of conference limitations, they can't play in BCS bowl games.

(West Virginia also has a legit case, but the 'Eers got screwed just because of Notre Dame's dollars, not because of a Big East limit on BCS bowl slots.) Notre Dame's 10-2 is less impressive than other 10-win seasons across the country. Wisconsin actually has a very poor strength of schedule--worse than the Irish, in fact--but the Badgers won 11 games.

The BCS--while adding a plus-one at the very least--needs to finally do away with the Notre Dame-friendly provisions and the two-team limits from conferences. The Irish derive more than enough benefit from their independent status as it is; the pot need not be sweetened any more.

Houston's return to glory

By John Harris
5. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, the Southwest Conference was one of the strongest conferences in the nation, and the Houston Cougars were one of the major reasons why.  The legacy of the program was much stronger than most people understood.  Heisman Trophy winner Andre Ware.  Wilson Whitley.  Jason Phillips.  The 1984 surprising conference champs.  The Run and Shoot offenses of the late 1980s and early 1990s.  But, when the SWC died a painful death and the major players in the SWC merged with the Big 8, U of H was left holding the bag…and searching for a life after, so to speak.  The Cougs moved out of the Astrodome, moved into Robertson Stadium, saw a few coaches come and go and toiled in relative anonymity.  Even after two bowls in three years under head coach Art Briles, there were still those in the city who didn’t believe in this program. 

Maybe that’s what made Friday night so special.  Walking through the parking lot before the game, the atmosphere was unbelievable, hours before the game.  Fortunately for the home folks, the Cougars overcame a first half time out gaffe to roll over Southern Miss to win the program’s first CUSA championship since 1996.  But, perhaps more importantly, U of H got the nation’s fourth largest city’s attention, again.  As the Cougars floundered in recent years and the Texans arrived in the NFL, the city’s college football programs didn’t register on the radar of many living there.  But, folks rallied around Briles and his charges on Friday in a way that’s difficult to describe.  The Cougars repaid the favor by outlasting a Golden Eagle squad that had beaten them earlier this year, setting off an on-field celebration that symbolized how much this title meant to everyone involved.

It was a special night and one in which anyone in that stadium wearing red and white will remember forever - a night that stirred up memories of Klingler, C Spoon and the veer.  It was a program that a city once forgot, but not any more. 
  



Story Tools
Top Stories 
Search Stories 
Discuss on Forums