Fiu, Cirminiello, Mitchell on TV - Campus Insiders | Buy College Football Tickets

CFN Five-Year Program Ranking & Analysis

CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Aug 23, 2011


How do all 120 program compare and rank over the last five years? Which programs are best in the classroom as well as on the field? Check it all out in CFN's 2011 Five-Year Program Rankings and Analysis.

CFN 2011 Five-Year

Program Analysis

Using several factors in order to determine the best all-around programs in college football, we present the CFN Five-Year Program Analysis.  To do this, ten factors are used from attendance and graduation to big wins and bad losses, but it all comes down to winning. If you win, few other things matter.

The Scoring System 

- Attendance. How much fan support is there? Obviously some stadiums are far bigger than others so this might not seem fair, but it's a good indication of interest in the program counting the average attendance for home dates from 2004 to 2008 and divided by 10,000 to get the score. For example, Georgia averaged 92,731 fans per game over the last three seasons, so the program gets a score of 9.27. 

Why this is important: Some stadiums are bigger than others and some teams get more support, but that's the point. It's a big deal to the bottom line of an athletic department, and the relevance of the football program to recruits and the national media, to get 100,000+ butts in the seats at places like Ohio State, Tennessee and Penn State. How can Eastern Michigan and its average of 11,000 fans per game compete when compared to Michigan and its average of 112,000 fans? Exactly.  

- APR. From the most recent batch of Academic Performance Rates available from the NCAA, if a program finished in the top 10%, it got a score of 10. If a program finished in the 40%-49% range, it got a score of 5. For example, Boise State's most recently released APR for football players was 70-80%, so it gets a score of 8.

Why this is important: After all, these are supposed to be student-athletes out there playing. This is a good indicator for how much emphasis a program places on academics rather than simply using the football players for their on-the-field talents.

- FBS wins over the last five years. The number of wins over FBS teams a program has from 2006-2010. (Wins over D-IAA/FCS teams aren't counted.)

Why this is important: At the end of the day, this is all that really matters to college football fans. Winning games makes everything else forgivable.

- Quality wins over the last five years. How many wins from 2006 to 2010 does a program have over FBS teams that finished with a winning record or in a bowl game against a team that finished .500?

Why this is important: This goes to show the consistency of programs when compared to the above-average. Programs that consistently win these games are always in the hunt for conference titles and big bowl games.

- Players drafted over the last five years. The number of players selected in the NFL Draft from 2007 to 2011 divided by two for the score. 

Why this is important: This is a bigger deal than you might think. If a blue-chip recruit is trying to decide between two schools, he'll most likely go to the one with the better track record of sending its players to the next level. If a big-time program has a low score, that might mean less emphasis is put on player development and readiness for the NFL.

- Conference winning percentage over the last five years. From 2006 to 2010, this is what percentage of conference games has a team won. Conference championship games don't count in the conference winning percentages (those count in the total wins and, more often than not, in the Quality Win component.) Keep in mind that some programs switched leagues; that's taken into account. For the teams without a conference affiliation for a given year, their overall winning percentages were used.

Why this is important: All teams shoot for conference titles first and foremost. BCS bowl games and national titles are great, but those require a certain amount of good fortune. Take care of conference play and everything else will fall into place.

- Elite Wins. This is how many wins a program has from 2006 to 2010 over teams that finished a season with two losses or fewer, or wins on the road or in a bowl or conference championship game over teams that finished with three losses or fewer. An extra 0.5 is added for an Elite Win on the road. If a team beats a team that finished with three losses twice, it gets credit for two Elite Wins.

- Why this is important: These are, more often than not, the types of wins that make good programs great, and are the wins the fans remember.

- Bad Losses. These are the number of losses a program has from 2006 to 2010 against teams that finished a season with three wins or fewer or to FCS teams. This number is subtracted from the overall score. An extra 0.5 is taken off a bad loss at home.

Why this is important: Lose to a bad team and the win the week before gets quickly forgotten about. These are the losses that suck the life out of a team and a season.

- Elite Losses. This is how many losses a program has from 2006 to 2010 over teams that finished a season with two losses or fewer. The score is 25% of the actual number. Ohio State has eight Elite Losses and gets 2 points added to the score.

Why this is important: It's not always a team's fault when it gets nailed with a loss to an elite team. It shows that some losses are different than others.

- Bad Wins. This is how many wins a program has from 2006 to 2010 over teams that finished a season with three losses or fewer or to FCS teams. The score is 25% of the actual number. Georgia has 12 bad Wins and gets 3 points taken off its score.
Why this is important: There's no reason to reward a win over a bad team. This acknowledges that some wins are lesser than others.


Related Stories
CFN Three-Year Program Ranking - 11 to 25
 -by CollegeFootballNews.com  Aug 18, 2007
Navy football: Ranking the 12 opponents
 -by GoMids.com  Jul 31, 2007
TYM: PSU Preseason Prep
 -by FightOnState.com  Aug 1, 2007