2007
Preseason Rankings
National Title
Contenders - No. 1 to No. 10
The best teams in the nation
There's
one very important distinction in the CFN preseason rankings: these
are based on how good the teams are going into the season and NOT
how they're going to finish. Some teams have easier
schedules than others, some get tougher road games and some will
need a little bit of time to jell meaning they might be better than
their final record might indicate. Going into the year, these are
how good the teams appear to be from No. 1 through 119.
CFN 2007 Preseason Rankings
11 to 20 |
21 to 29 |
30 to 39 |
40 to 49 |
50 to 59
60 to 69 |
70 to 79 |
80 to 89 |
90 to 99 |
100 to 109 |
110 to 119
10.
Georgia Tech
-
Georgia Tech |
Offense Preview |
Defense
|
Depth Chart
Why
Georgia Tech should be No. 1: Had Calvin Johnson foolishly decided
to come back for his senior year, Georgia Tech probably would've been
our sleeper choice to play USC for the national title. There might not
be a better set of lines in the country, and everything will revolve
around them. RB Tashard Choice is an elite runner who'll have plenty of
room to run, while QB Taylor Bennett will be an upgrade over Reggie
Ball. Just about everyone returns to a stellar defense, led by LB Philip
Wheeler, and a top-notch safety tandem of Jamal Lewis and Djay Jones.
Why Georgia Tech isn't No. 1: James Johnson might be a nice
receiver, but he's not Calvin Johnson. Losing CJ will hurt the most, but
losing offensive coordinator Patrick Nix to Miami will also sting. The
depth is thin at linebacker and the corners aren't necessarily special.
Tech's biggest problem has always been game-in-and-game-out consistency,
and this year won't be any different. You know the total clunker is
coming, you just don't know when (possibly at Maryland).
Relative Strengths: Offensive Line, Defensive Line
Relative
Weaknesses:
Wide Receiver, Secondary
9.
Ohio State
-
Ohio State Preview |
Offense
|
Defense |
Depth Chart
Why
Ohio State should be No. 1: You don't think this team is motivated
to come out roaring after what happened in Glendale? Last year the
offense was loaded and the question mark was the defense. This year, the
defense should be national title-level good and the O is the concern.
Buckeye fans won't have to worry too much with RB Chris Wells working
behind a rock of a line. The defense is loaded with too many good
players to get on the field at once (remember the name
Dexter Larimore), while the special teams
will be among the best in the Big Ten.
Why Ohio State isn't No. 1: Last year's team might have been
overrated, and this year's team might be underrated, but there are still
just enough issues to keep the Buckeyes from being considered one of the
favorites to go to New Orleans. Losing a Heisman-winning quarterback and
two first round draft pick receivers doesn't help, and while this is
Ohio State and it reloads, there will be a learning curve before the
offense starts to sing again.
Relative Strengths: Offensive Line, Linebacker
Relative
Weaknesses: Quarterback, Wide Receiver
8.
Louisville
-
Louisville Preview |
Offense |
Defense
|
Depth Chart
Why
Louisville should be No. 1: Keep your Big East biases to yourself;
Louisville is the real deal. Last year's team was a field goal away from
playing Ohio State for the national title, and this year's team is
better. QB Brian Brohm should be in the Cleveland Browns training camp
instead of returning to lead one of the nation's most potent offenses,
and he has a receiving corps worthy of making him look terrific. The duo
of Anthony Allen and George Stripling will make the running game explode
behind a great line. The defense is fast, athletic, and forces a ton of
mistakes.
Why Louisville isn't No. 1: While the Cardinals are better than
you think, the defensive back seven is as average as you probably think
it is. LB Malik Jackson is a playmaker, but the secondary will give up
plenty of big plays and has big issues at cornerback. New head coach
Steve Kragthorpe is a rising superstar, but can he be as good as Bobby
Petrino? His performance could be the X factor in the national title
chase.
Relative Strengths: Quarterback, Wide Receiver
Relative
Weaknesses: Secondary, Linebacker
7.
Virginia Tech
-
Virginia Tech |
Offense Preview
|
Defense
|
Depth Chart
Why
Virginia Tech should be No. 1: Defense, defense, defense, and more
defense. The nation's best D for each of the last two years should make
it a trifecta with eight starters returning led by LB Vince Hall and CB
Brandon Flowers, two All-Americans who'll be just a part of the show.
The line is loaded with talented veterans, and there are so many good
players all over the player that there will be no one for offensive
coordinators to exploit.
Why Virginia Tech isn't No. 1: The offense will go absolutely
nowhere if anything happens to RB Branden Ore. The line isn't anything
special, the receiving corps has been an underwhelming disappointment
over the past few years, and QB Sean Glennon, while appearing to be
improved, isn't going to scare anyone. Forgive us for putting a tragedy
into a football equation, but the pressure might eventually be too much
to bear. Ever since April, everyone has been talking about how good the
football team is supposed to be and how the entire community will rally
around it. That's a lot to ask for considering everyone will get up to
play the ACC favorites.
Relative Strengths: Linebacker, Secondary
Relative
Weaknesses: Quarterback, Offensive Line
6.
Michigan
-
Michigan Preview |
Offense |
Defense |
Depth Chart
Why
Michigan should be No. 1: Who's going to stop this offense? QB Chad
Henne, RB Mike Hart, and WR Mario Manningham might form the great trio
of skill players in the history of Michigan football, and they'll have a
great line to work behind thanks to the return of tackle Jake Long. Much
will be made about the holes to fill on defense, but the speed and raw
talent are there to be ultra-productive and extremely disruptive. The D
doesn't have to be the best in the nation with this offense putting up
points in bunches.
Why Michigan isn't No. 1: Mike Hart has a history of getting
banged up. He made it through last year, but if he gets hit with the
nagging injuries that kept him out from time to time in the past, the
offense could bog down; he's that valuable. The secondary could be more
than just a problem, it could be a screaming, glaring weakness early on
if there isn't a big pass rush to help out the cause. Talk about
pressure, Henne, Hart and Long have had to hear several times a day for
the last few years that they haven't beaten Ohio State or won a bowl
game. Don't be shocked if there's a lack of focus from time to time as
the team looks ahead to the make-or-break games at the end of the season
that'll define some great careers.
Relative Strengths: Running Back, Quarterback
Relative
Weaknesses: Secondary, Special Teams
5.
Wisconsin
-
Wisconsin Preview |
Offense
|
Defense |
Depth Chart
Why
Wisconsin should be No. 1:
Nine starters are back on offense and seven return on defense from a
team that was a win at Michigan away from playing Ohio State for the
national title. While you basically know what's coming with RB P.J. Hill
rumbling behind a big, talented offensive line, stopping what the
Badgers are going to want to do is another question. The passing game
won't be just an afterthought with Travis Beckum, Luke Swan, Paul
Hubbard, and other great prospects forming one of the deepest and best
receiving corps in recent Wisconsin history.
Jack
Ikegwuonu and Allen Langford form the nation's best cornerback duo.
Why Wisconsin isn't No. 1: The quarterback situation is still up
in the air between Tyler Donovan and Allen Evridge, and while the team
can win big with either one, there could be a controversy as the year
goes on if the starter doesn't use the good receiving corps to light
defenses up like a Christmas tree. The defensive front seven is full of
grinders that play above their talent level. Of course, the big issue is
the past schedule when using last year to look ahead to this season.
Wisconsin hardly looked great with the win over Arkansas in the bowl
game, and that was the only victory of note. There's a huge, national
outcry for this team to actually prove it, but if this team is as good
as expected, the jury will still be out until it's 6-0 and going to Penn
State.
Relative Strengths: Offensive Line, Running Back
Relative
Weaknesses: Defensive Line, Quarterback
4.
Texas
-
Texas |
Offense Preview |
Defense
|
Depth Chart
Why
Texas should be No. 1: Colt McCoy proved he could be a big-game,
big-time quarterback, and he has Limas Sweed and a loaded receiving
corps to work with. If Jamaal Charles is over his sophomore slump,
there's enough speed and talent in the backfield to run on anyone
keeping the safeties back to deal with the NFL-caliber receiving corps.
The linebacking corps is deep and very, very good. Average teams can all
but forget about running the ball on this group.
Why Texas isn't No. 1: Let's not mince words here; the secondary
flat-out sucked, and that was with a slew of NFL talent and a Thorpe
Award winner. Part of the problem was an aggressive scheme that led the
DBs out in the cold, but that's no excuse considering the talent level.
Now the secondary is in transition after losing three starters, but with
a change in scheme that'll help out the pass defense, the defensive
backs might not be the team's biggest concern. If injuries hit the
offensive line, the whole machine might stall. There's stunningly little
depth up front.
Relative Strengths: Wide Receiver, Linebacker
Relative
Weaknesses: Secondary, Offensive Line Depth
3.
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma |
Offense Preview |
Defense
|
Depth Chart
Why
Oklahoma should be No. 1: You've dismissed the defending Big 12
champions after they lost to Boise State and after all the off-season
controversy and vacated wins. That's a big, big mistake. This is a
national title-level Sooner team that has, arguably, the nation's best
offensive line, the nation's best secondary, the country's best NFL
receiver prospect in Malcolm Kelly, and great special teams that'll pull
out at least one win. Losing Adrian Peterson isn't a plus, but three
great running backs, highlighted by emerging superstar DeMarco Murray,
will run wild behind the elite line.
Why Oklahoma isn't No. 1: The Sooners always seem to get by with
mediocre talent at quarterback (Jason White included), but they're going
to be pushing it early on. Sam Bradford can play and will eventually be
terrific, and Joey Halzle can certainly lead the attack considering all
the time he'll have to operate, but compared to other top teams, OU is
woefully untested under center. To nitpick, the linebacking corps is
relatively new and could use a little time to grow into a cohesive unit.
Relative Strengths: Offensive Line, Secondary
Relative
Weaknesses: Quarterback, Linebacker
2.
LSU
-
LSU Preview |
Offense |
Defense
|
Depth Chart
Why
LSU should be No. 1: The story writes itself. So hot at the end
of last year that some declared it the best team in America (as
misguided as that might have been considering you and ten friends
could've bombed away on Notre Dame), LSU is coming in with a ton of
hype, a tailor-made schedule with the toughest road game at Alabama,
and enough overall talent to end up playing in New Orleans for the
national title in a feel-good moment for a city and region that
could use all they can get. Glenn Dorsey, Tyson Jackson and the
defensive line will be next to impossible to run on, while the
talented linebacking corps will clean everything else up. The
offense might lose a slew of stars, but there are more than enough
playmakers to keep things moving, including a backfield that should
be more productive as long as Keiland Williams runs as well as
expected.
Why LSU isn't No. 1: Matt Flynn is a veteran quarterback, but
he's not JaMarcus Russell. The departure of Russell and top
receivers Dwayne Bowe and Craig Davis isn't nearly as tough as the
loss of offensive coordinator Jimbo Fisher to Florida State. New man
Gary Crowton has a big name and an interesting résumé, but he has to
prove himself after his Oregon attack went into the tank over the
second half of last year despite boasting a slew of talent.
Relative Strengths: Defensive Line, Secondary
Relative Weaknesses: Special Teams, Receiver Depth
1.
USC
-
USC Preview
|
Offense
|
Defense
|
Depth
Chart
Why USC
is No. 1: This is the best defense Pete Carroll has had at USC. The
second-team linebacking unit would start at about 100 other places,
while the starters from one to 11 are, at the very least, All-Pac 10
caliber. There are at least seven defenders worthy of All-America
consideration, and enough talented depth to quickly step in if and when
one of the future millionaires gets hurt. Offensively, John David Booty
is now a crusty veteran after having been in the program, seemingly,
since the John McKay days. The skill players might not be known names
quite yet outside of recruiting circles, but if you're not a five-star
running back or receiver prospect, you needn't apply for a spot on the
two deep depth chart, and three deep in some cases. It's not a stretch
by any means to consider this team the most talented, at least in terms
of high school prospects, in the history of college football. At this
point, around the country, other teams are comparing their star players
by saying they likely could've played at USC.
Why USC shouldn't be No. 1: Fine, so everyone looks great if you
listen to all the recruiting yahoos, and there's supposedly too much
talent for any one team to field, but everyone still has to produce.
Patrick Turner and Vidal Hazelton are supposed to be superstar
receivers, and Chauncey Washington, C.J. Gable, Emmanuel Moody and
others are supposed to run wild, but they haven't actually done
it yet. Everyone's going to be kissing this team's butt for the next
several months, and while the hype might not grow to the sickening
proportions it did in 2005, the weekly pressure to not just be great,
but to dominate, will be immense.
Relative Strengths: Linebacker, Secondary
Relative
Weaknesses:
Proven Wide Receiver and Running Back Production
CFN 2007 Preseason Rankings
11 to 20 |
21 to 29 |
30 to 39 |
40 to 49 |
50 to 59
60 to 69 |
70 to 79 |
80 to 89 |
90 to 99 |
100 to 109 |
110 to 119