2007 CFN
Unit Rankings
Offensive Lines
CFN 2007 Unit Rankings
2007 Preview |
Offenses |
Quarterbacks |
Running Backs
Receivers |
Defenses |
Defensive Lines
Linebackers |
Secondaries |
Special Teams
1. Oklahoma
A
major concern going into last year eventually turned into a
phenomenal strength. Even with injuries and a little bit of
shuffling, the line was killing defenses over the second half of
last year. Now it's even better with what might be the best line
in the Bob Stoops era. Obviously, he's had some decent ones over
the years. Size, depth,
athleticism, NFL skill, options, rising prospect, reliable
veterans, this group has it all.
2. USC
Sure, there’ll
be mild growing pains with two new starters, but if Drew
Radovich and Jeff Byers can remain healthy and play up to their
potential, any drop-off from last year will be subtle. It helps
that the Trojans won’t see a top-flight defensive line until the
second half of the year. The anchor of the front wall will be
senior left tackle Sam Baker, a two-time All-American and
arguably the most complete lineman in the country this season.
Entering his fourth year as the starter, he’s the total package,
a top pass protector and improving run blocker, who’ll begin the
2007 season in the best shape of his career.
3. Georgia Tech
If it's true that a
veteran offensive line is the true key to a good
team, than Tech should be fantastic. Pass
protection will be a bit more of a premium
without the mobile Reggie Ball under center
anymore, but this group should be able to handle
it. Getting the backups, especially on the
inside, more meaningful work would be a big help
going into next year. There isn't a lot of star
power outside of Andrew Gardner, but there's so
much experience, so much returning production
and so much good depth that anything less than a
big year will be a huge disappointment.
4. Ohio State
The Buckeye
offensive line was overrated in past seasons,
but not last year. Did you notice how much time
Troy Smith had to throw on just about every
play? You could've stood back there and waited
for Ted Ginn and Anthony Gonzalez to break open
with the time the tackles provided. Yes, they
were overwhelmed by Florida's speedy defensive
front, but that was hardly the team's biggest
problem in that game. There are three potential
first round draft picks and a good anchor in
Cordle to work around for the next several
years.
5.
Wisconsin
The left
tackle situation, after losing Joe Thomas, will
be more than fine with the combination of Jake
Bscherer and Gabe Carimi getting the job done.
Overrated throughout last year, the line will
live up to its billing going into this year.
Loaded with all-star candidates, and good
backups ready to breakthrough, this is the
strongest Badger line in several years.
6. Texas A&M
As long as injuries don't strike early on and
the backups are allowed time to develop and see
playing time, the line should be dominant. It's
good in pass protection, great in the running
game, and very experienced. It could stand to be
a bit more consistent against the top teams, and
this year, it should be.
7. Rutgers
Considering the job line coach Kyle Flood has
done the last two years, he has more than enough
returning talent in 2007 to whip this gang into
a cohesive unit. The Scarlet Knights will run
and pass block equally well this fall, even if
the underbelly is a little softer than it was a
year ago. With Pedro Sosa and Jeremy Zuttah
sealing off the edge, good luck getting pressure
on Teel from the outside. If opposing defenses
want to disrupt the Scarlet Knight quarterback,
they better be equipped with defensive tackles
that can get penetration right up the gut.
8. Oregon State
The talent and experience is in place for Oregon
State to be one of the Pac-10’s most dominant
offensive lines. Now they’ve got to go out and
prove it against the league’s blue bloods later
this year.
The Beavers have a meat-and-potatoes crew that’s
at its best when it lines up and simply jams the
ball down the throat of opposing defenses. Yvenson
Bernard is a quality back, but he wouldn’t be as
effective running behind an ordinary line.
9. California
Cal does about as good a job as anyone coaching
up its offensive linemen. The line must replace
Andrew Cameron and Erik Robertson, but does
return three starters from one of 2006’s top
units in the country. Leading the way is junior
Alex Mack, a first team All-Pac-10 selection and
one of the premier centers in the country. With
Mack and Mike Gibson again playing like
all-leaguers, the retooled line will mesh
quickly, giving Nate Longshore and the backs the
time and holes needed to make plays.
10. Boise State
The line is going to
be a killer as is, but it could be truly special
if Pete Cavender is 100%. Lucariello's knee
injury threw a wrench into the overall plans,
but this is still the WAC's best line and there
isn't even a remotely close second. However,
there can't be any more major injuries.
This isn't just an
overachieving group that happens to be good
because it plays in the WAC; this line can beat
up anyone. With four returning starters, there's
no reason to expect a slip from last year.
|
11 |
Michigan |
|
12 |
Florida |
|
13 |
Missouri |
|
14 |
Louisville |
|
15 |
LSU |
|
16 |
Maryland |
|
17 |
Penn State |
|
18 |
Vanderbilt |
|
19 |
Arizona State |
|
20 |
BYU |
|
21 |
West Virginia |
|
22 |
TCU |
|
23 |
Wake Forest |
|
24 |
Purdue |
|
25 |
Texas |
|
26 |
Utah |
|
27 |
Arkansas |
|
28 |
Oklahoma State |
|
29 |
Tennessee |
|
30 |
Georgia |
|
31 |
UCLA |
|
32 |
Minnesota |
|
33 |
Fresno State |
|
34 |
Alabama |
|
35 |
Pitt |
|
36 |
Virginia Tech |
|
37 |
Nebraska |
|
38 |
Oregon |
|
39 |
Miami |
|
40 |
Washington |
|
41 |
Notre Dame |
|
42 |
Illinois |
|
43 |
Clemson |
|
44 |
Northwestern |
|
45 |
Boston College |
|
46 |
Arizona |
|
47 |
Michigan State |
|
48 |
Mississippi |
|
49 |
Virginia |
|
50 |
Texas Tech |
|
51 |
Washington State |
|
52 |
Florida State |
|
53 |
NC State |
|
54 |
Colorado |
|
55 |
Iowa |
|
56 |
South Florida |
|
57 |
Kansas |
|
58 |
Mississippi State |
|
59 |
North Carolina |
|
60 |
Auburn |
|
61 |
Western Michigan |
|
62 |
Hawaii |
|
63 |
Syracuse |
|
64 |
Stanford |
|
65 |
New Mexico |
|
66 |
Central Michigan |
|
67 |
Iowa State |
|
68 |
South Carolina |
|
69 |
Nevada |
|
70 |
Indiana |
|
71 |
Cincinnati |
|
72 |
Duke |
|
73 |
Houston |
|
74 |
Baylor |
|
75 |
Marshall |
|
76 |
Kansas State |
|
77 |
Northern Illinois |
|
78 |
Southern Miss |
|
79 |
Toledo |
|
80 |
UCF |
|
81 |
Bowling Green |
|
82 |
Ohio |
|
83 |
New Mexico State |
|
84 |
Kentucky |
|
85 |
Colorado State |
|
86 |
Wyoming |
|
87 |
Memphis |
|
88 |
UNLV |
|
89 |
San Diego State |
|
90 |
Ball State |
|
91 |
Louisiana Tech |
|
92 |
Connecticut |
|
93 |
San Jose State |
|
94 |
SMU |
|
95 |
Miami Univ. |
|
96 |
UL Monroe |
|
97 |
Air Force |
|
98 |
Navy |
|
99 |
Rice |
|
100 |
UTEP |
|
101 |
Akron |
|
102 |
East Carolina |
|
103 |
Tulsa |
|
104 |
Utah State |
|
105 |
Kent State |
|
106 |
Middle Tennessee |
|
107 |
UL Lafayette |
|
108 |
Tulane |
|
109 |
Arkansas State |
|
110 |
Troy |
|
111 |
UAB |
|
112 |
Temple |
|
113 |
Idaho |
|
114 |
FIU |
|
115 |
Eastern Michigan |
|
116 |
Florida Atlantic |
|
117 |
North Texas |
|
118 |
Army |
|
119 |
Buffalo |