What Two Teams Belong In The Championship?
Virginia Tech's Sean Glennon & Eddie Royal
Virginia Tech's Sean Glennon & Eddie Royal
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Dec 2, 2007


What two teams should be playing for the national title? Three CFNers break it all down to go along with what the CFN Historical Rankings Formula says.

What Two Teams Belong In The BCS Championship

With all the chaos here are a few thoughts on the teams that deserve to be in.

Pete Fiutak

Q: What two teams belong in the national title?

A. This is one of my favorite times of year because we get to finally put together the CFN Historical Rankings Formula, which we'll come out with on Monday with all 119 teams and their rankings. The rankings are based on their schedules, who they've beaten, and who deserves to be in the top spots based on what actually happened on the field. More on that in a moment.

Sorry Georgia, I can't get past the fact that you couldn't even win your own division. If I'm going to be consistent in my beliefs, being hot at the end of the season should mean as much as being hot at the beginning of the season.

Sorry USC, you lost to Stanford and I'm still not sold on your offense. Defense, yes, offense, eh, whatever. I'm not a believer, but you'll go off and blow away anyone you play in the Rose Bowl.

Sorry Ohio State, I sort of like your team, but I just can't get the Illinois game out of my head, and at the end of the day, I just don't believe you beat anyone of note.

By the eyeball test, I'd have Oklahoma play LSU for the national championship, with Ohio State just barely missing the cut by an eyelash. If these two play to their full capabilities, I believe they're the two best teams in America. However, that's what I believe.

Who deserves to play for the national title? I was stunned when we cranked out the first batch of the CFN Historical Rankings Formula. Again, released in full on Monday, based on a combination of wins, wins over teams that finished with winning records, elite wins, bad wins, bad losses, elite losses, point differential and play in conference, the two teams that deserve to play for the national title, and it's stunningly not even close ... Oklahoma vs. Virginia Tech.

With all the breakdowns coming, the rankings, based on who earned it on the field, are 1) Virginia Tech, 2) Oklahoma, 3) LSU, 4) West Virginia, 5) Ohio State. Georgia is seventh, USC is ninth. Remember, Tech beat Clemson at Clemson, Virginia at Virginia, and Clemson. In this crazy year, there weren't that many Elite Wins on the road. LSU's schedule was fantastic at the time, but when South Carolina and Alabama went into the tank, things quickly changed. Ohio State didn't get a top road win, and that includes Michigan, and Georgia didn't beat anyone but Florida and Auburn, and only Florida counted as an Elite Win.

However, I do want to see what LSU would do healthy.

Richard Cirminiello

Q: What two teams belong in the national title?

A
: First off, let’s never pass on an opportunity to state the obvious: The current BCS system blows by any and every measure.  If you believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that the two best teams will be playing for a national title in January and no one was overlooked, you’re kidding yourself.  About half a dozen teams have a decent argument in this debate, which is why some form of a playoff is so wildly popular.

Alright, let’s start with what suddenly became obvious late Saturday night; Ohio State belongs in the fast lane to New Orleans.  As the nation’s only one-loss team with a conference championship, the Buckeyes have completed their improbable climb from No. 7 to No. 1 in under a month.  And who can argue with an 11-1 team out of the Big Ten in a season that’s been defined by its persistent mediocrity?  Their opponent gets quite a bit trickier.  

Although I love the way Georgia’s been playing, it makes no sense taking a Dawg team that didn’t win its division over an LSU program that won the SEC conference, especially since both have two losses.  Ditto USC, which has regrouped nicely, but of all the two-loss contenders, has the most damning defeat at the hands of Stanford.  See you, Troy.  That leaves Oklahoma and LSU, a couple of 11-2 teams that won two of the toughest conferences in the country, the Big 12 and SEC, respectively.  Everyone will have an angle in this debate, and most will be splitting hairs.  Mine is no different.  With two similar bodies of work, the Tigers rate a slight edge for playing a tougher schedule and for being the only team in America that hasn’t lost a game in regulation.  Remember that LSU’s best non-conference win is against top 5 Virginia Tech, while Oklahoma’s is versus five-win Miami, and the Tigers’ two losses came in triple overtime.      

So when the dust settles on this mess, it’ll be LSU hosting Ohio State in the inaugural Default Bowl.  Championships are won in November…yeah, right.               

Matthew Zemek

Q: What two teams belong in the national title?

A. Who Deserves the Undeservable?

Want to know who deserves to play in the 2007 BCS title game, now that all hell has broken loose... for the 477th time this season?
 
There are, as always, two distinct ways of viewing this and other similar situations that emerge at the end of almost every college football season (the only exception being when two and only two unbeaten teams from BCS conferences remain after 14 weeks and 12 regular-season games): what should happen within the existing BCS system, and what should happen in terms of real football justice?
 
In accordance with BCS guidelines, the system--as currently set up--should give us Ohio State and LSU. Ohio State has done more than one-loss Kansas to merit a bid (albeit by a smaller margin than you might think). LSU is the most deserving two-loss team because the Tigers crushed Virginia Tech, won their conference, and claimed more quality scalps than USC. As fortunate as LSU was to slide past Tennessee, the Tigers still have the best resume of any two-loss ballclub.
 
Now, on the matter of the second question, the debate is tougher: what should happen irrespective of the BCS? In an ideal world, what should happen?
 
Since conference championships are a prerequisite for national title game participants, Georgia still can't make the cut (although an idea world would involve a playoff in which the Dawgs could play for the title). If the BCS didn't exist, the best title game the sport could hope for would be LSU-USC, the matchup everyone outside Columbus would love. The champions of the SEC and Pac-10, college football's two best conferences, would create a title tilt worthy of the bright lights in the Big Easy.

  

 



Story Tools
Top Stories 
Search Stories 
Discuss on Forums