|
|
|
Tuesday Question - Did The BCS Get It Right?
|
|
|

Ohio State WR Brian Hartline
|
|
|
CollegeFootballNews.com Posted Dec 4, 2007
|
|
At the end of the day, did the BCS get it right? Four CFNers weigh in.
|
Pete
Fiutak
Q:
At the end of the day, did the BCS get it right?
A:
Yes for the championship game, not necessarily for the rest.
My sister could pick the two teams for the BCS Championship if there are
two unbeaten teams from BCS conferences at the end of the year, but in
lieu of a playoff, the BCS is better than the old poll 'n' bowl system.
The idea is to compare apples to oranges, and this year, sure, Ohio
State vs. LSU is more than fine considering the Buckeyes were No. 1
throughout most of the year and LSU was basically the best team
throughout the season and it won the SEC title. If you're the SEC champ,
you get the benefit of the doubt.
Oklahoma is just barely the number three team in the mix and has a beef,
but it was too inconsistent on the road. If it's a choice between the
Big 12 champion or the SEC champ, the nod, right now, has to go to the
SEC winner. USC lost to Stanford, next.
As far as the other BCS games, Illinois should be in the Capital One and
Missouri should be in instead of Kansas. Since there's still a silly
rule in tact when it comes to only two teams from a league being able to
get in, KU was the one who should've been out and Arizona State probably
deserved to be in.
Richard
Cirminiello
Q:
At the end of the day, did the BCS get it right?
A:
Absolutely no one wants to admit this, but, yeah, based on the rules
it’s governed by, the BCS did get the title game right.
To answer this question honestly, you’ve got to be able to divorce
yourself from your passionate dislike for the system. Although the
system still rots, when the dust settled Sunday morning, Ohio State and
LSU were the two most deserving schools to earn a trip to the National
Championship game in New Orleans. The task for the BCS was simple, find
the best one-loss team, and pit it against the best two-loss team.
Nominating the Buckeyes over Kansas was child’s play. The Tigers over
the other half-dozen schools with two losses? Not so much. While not
clear-cut or easy, LSU was the right choice. Yeah, the loss to Arkansas
was hard to digest, but this was a season in which everyone had major
flaws. USC lost to Stanford. Georgia got butchered by Tennessee, and
didn’t even win its division. Oklahoma had a rotten out of conference
schedule. Virginia Tech lost in Baton Rouge by 41 points. LSU, on the
other hand, went 6-1 against teams that were ranked when they played,
winning the toughest conference in the country. And in a season marked
by parity and mediocrity, that should be more than enough to fill the
other half of the dance card alongside Ohio State.
John
Harris
Q:
At the end of the day, did the BCS get it right?
A: This year? The year when Cal went from
number two team in the country to the Armed Forces Bowl? When Oregon
went from contender to 8-4? When USF and Boston College were once at
number two? When national championship contenders LSU and Ohio State
have a shorter winning streak than 3-9 Notre Dame (thanks Brad
Edwards!). Honestly, what’s been ‘right’ this season? Nada. Zip.
Nil. Zilch. No-thing. So, is it possible in a year when anything was,
and is, plausible, that the BCS could actually get it right?
Absolutely. Every contending team is flawed, some in a major way, so in
some sense any two teams could be in this game and it’d make some sort
of sense.
I’ll put it this way, I
don’t have a big argument with anything that resulted from the BCS,
other than the fact that the voters saw fit ‘to go vigilante’ on the
process and keep a non-championship team out of the final two (Georgia
and Kansas). That’s the one beef I have (and a small one at that) - if
the voters didn’t want or didn’t think that Georgia was worthy of
playing in the national championship game, then don’t put them at four
going into the final weekend. Other than that, I’m not losing any sleep
over what happened, sans Missouri getting screwed for a bid to the
Orange Bowl. But, then again, that has nothing to do with the BCS.
Matthew
Zemek
Q:
At the end of the day, did the BCS get it right?
A: No, it didn't.
The BCS has "gotten it right" three times in its 10-year existence.
Wanna guess when those three occasions were?
1999? Good answer. Va Tech-Florida State--two and only two unbeaten
teams.
2002? Nice going. Ohio State and Miami. Two and only two unbeaten
teams.
2005? Great! Texas and USC--two and only two untouched titans.
The other seven times, including this year, have been disastrous.
And as I said in other pieces over the past 72 hours, it's worth
noting that the three years with "classic" 1 vs. 2 title games have
been really good. The six previous BCS title games with at least one
dubious participant (if not two) have all stunk.
It's more than a coincidence.
If Ohio State and LSU play a classic, I'll eat crow... for this year
(not the past nine years of the hauntingly awful BCS era).
|
|
|
|
|
|