Click Here to Email This Story to a Friend Click Here for a Printer Friendly Version
Scout.com RSS Feeds 
March Madness 2008 - Midwest Bracket Previews
Kansas G Sherron Collins
Kansas G Sherron Collins
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Mar 15, 2008

The breakdowns, strengths, weaknesses and predictions for each team in the Midwest bracket.

2008 March Madness - Midwest

2008 March Madness Breakdowns
East | South |
West   

Midwest Bracket

No. 1 Kansas Jayhawks – Big 12 (31-3, 13-3 in the Big 12) 
Basically: Easily one of the most disappointing tournament teams over the last several years, at least on a consistent basis considering the expectations in Lawrence, this should be the team that finally gets over the hump in the Bill Self era, even if this was considered to be a bit of a rebuilding season. Another Elite Eight might not do it this time; it’s Final Four or bust for the Big 12 champions. One of the nation’s most balanced and versatile teams, the Jayhawks can run, grind, slow it down or speed it up. The time is now for Self to get to his first Final Four.
Strengths: Blowing teams away. When KU has a chance to go for the jugular, it’s over. With the average win coming by more than 20 points, few teams are able to put their foot on the offensive gas and go on a run like this one. The offense is great at not making mistakes, fantastic at moving the ball around and finding the open man, and tremendous at shooting inside and out, the offense can do it all.
Weaknesses: Teams with a pulse. Is KU the real deal? The three losses came on the road to Kansas State, Texas, two strong tournament teams, and Oklahoma State, who’ll go to the NIT. The Big 12 championship win over the Longhorns will only jack up the expectations even more, and KU hasn’t exactly flourished when the spotlight has been on Self’s teams. Most of the close calls have come against teams like Arizona, USC, and Georgia Tech. Oh sure, there will be a major blowout or two to get to the Elite Eight, but then there will be the big test for the team and Self. Neither has passed in recent tournaments.
Players You Should Care About: The bad: Brandon Rush is coming off a torn ACL. The good; Brandon Rush is coming off a torn ACL. Had the junior not suffered the injury in an off-season pickup game, he’d have most likely been off to the NBA instead of working his way back to being among the team’s most dangerous weapons. While he might not have all the same explosion, he’s still an effective scorer because the rest of the offense is so effective. With Rush still mending, sophomore forward Darrell Arthur has turned into the player everyone hoped he’d become. Not only does he lead the team in scoring, but he has also established himself as a steady and strong rebounder.
Best Wins: Baylor 100-90; Kansas State 88-74; Texas 84-74 (Big 12 Championship)
Worst Losses: at Kansas State 84-75; at Oklahoma State 61-60
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: National championship. The potential matchups to get to the Final Four are terrific, and there's more than enough firepower to get by anyone from the East, including North Carolina. Bill Self finally gets over the hump and shows he belongs among the elite head coaches.

No. 16 Portland State Vikings – Big Sky (23-9, 14-2 in the Big Sky) 
Basically: Portland State is off to the tournament for the first time in its history after blowing past Northern Arizona 67-51 in the Big Sky Championship. Red hot after winning 14 of their last 15 games, the Vikings are a dangerous sleeper with a tremendous outside shooting game and good enough defense and rebounding to get by. While there are some brutally ugly losses on the résumé, losing to horrible Colorado State and UC Davis teams, and there aren’t any wins of note, this is the type of team that can get hot for a game and pull off a tourney shocker.
Strengths: Three-point shooting. Among the best in the nation from beyond the arc, the Vikings, led by Jeremiah Dominguez, average 8.9 three-pointers per game and aren’t afraid to keep bombing away even when things aren’t going well. Everyone passes well and everyone is good at working the ball around to find the open man for the three.
Weaknesses: Inside defense. Even with a big presence inside in Scott Morrison, teams have no problems getting to the basket and have no problem putting up big points from the outside. The Vikings aren’t a run-and-gun team and keep things relatively slow paced, which keeps the scoring down, but there are way too many turnovers which will allow anyone with a decent transition game to get quick points.
Players You Should Care About: Dominguez leads the Vikings with 14.3 points per game, is the top passer averaging 4.1 assists per outing and is good for two rebounds a game. Oh yeah, and he’s a mere 5-6 and 150 pounds. Lightning quick, he’s always able to find openings and get his three-point shot off. When he’s on, like he was in a blowout over Montana State when he made five of six three pointers and the game after against Montana hitting six of eight, the Vikings are deadly.
Best Wins: IUPUI 75-73; Northern Arizona 67-51 (Big Sky Championship)
Worst Losses: at Colorado State 64-63; UC Davis 76-68
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: The first trip to the NCAA tournament will not be pleasant.


No. 8 UNLV Rebels – Mountain West Conference (26-7, 12-4 in MWC)
Basically: The Rebels only dropped four games in the Mountain West and went undefeated at home in conference play for the second year in a row, but it was the blowout win over BYU for the Mountain West title that ended all talk of being on the bubble. Lon Kruger’s club proved to be resilient throughout as it never lost back-to-back games while knocking off each of the conference stars. They showed they can get the job done on the road early on this season with wins at San Diego and Northern Arizona, and after a tremendous run in last year’s tournament, highlighted by the win over Wisconsin, the team is still in place to get past the first weekend.
Strengths: Toughness. Time and again, the Rebels were challenged in key games and kept finding ways to win. While the offense is limited, the defense keeps the team in games forcing opponents to shoot around 40% from the field and score fewer than 62 points per game. They also haul in close to 24 defensive rebounds per game that grossly limits its opponent’s possessions. They ranked second in conference free throw shooting while conversing a shade over 74% from the line.
Weaknesses: Offense. Even though Kruger’s kids would prefer to get out and be the Runnin’ Rebels, they averaged a hair under 70 points per game and shot around 42%. There’s not a whole bunch of size and there’s not a lot of depth, so if the guards aren’t on, there will be problems. The team wore down as the season went on, and if it has to go against anyone who can bang, there likely won’t be the inside play needed to advance.
Players You Should Care About:  Lightning fast Wink Adams is the team’s leading scorer ringing in close to 16 points per game, while seniors Joe Darger and Curtis Terry are great running mates averaging close to 11 and 12 points per game, respectively. Surprisingly, the team leader in rebounds Rene Rougeau is a guard, but he’s not your prototypical perimeter player. At 6-6, he’s the team’s toughest player top ball thief, and best shot blocker.
Best Wins: BYU 70-41; New Mexico 79-60; BYU 76-61 (MWC Championship)
Worst Losses:  Arizona 52-49; at BYU 74-48
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Out in the second round against Kansas. Kent State doesn't have the inside game to beat the Rebels in the first round, but the Jayhawks will be about to go on a big run early to get by in the second.

No. 9 Kent State Golden Flashes – Mid American Conference (28-6, 13-3 in MAC)
Basically: KSU found itself back in a familiar role after upending Akron 61-58 in its final game of the regular season to win the MAC regular season title, and then rolled through the conference tournament finishing up with a 74-55 win over the Zips. After opening up the MAC play by winning six of its first seven games, and closing out by winning 11 of its last 12, this is a hot team at the right time. With a tough, aggressive defense, this is going to be a pain in the butt team to deal with in the first round or two.
Strengths: Aggressive D. The Golden Flashes held opponents to just under 63 points per game on just over 41% shooting from the field, and while the idea is to keep things relatively slow to force offenses to work for shots, the transition game is excellent. They picked apart the MAC stealing everything in sight and forced almost 17 turnovers per game. When the D is working, the offense takes advantage.
Weaknesses: The glass. Rebounding hasn’t always been a problem, but it’s not a strength getting beaten by the bigger teams with strong inside games while doing a decent job against the smaller, quicker teams. Physical glass cleaning teams should be able to have their way with the interior. The MAC, as a whole, doesn’t boast the toughest competition, even though the conference came up with a couple of nice non-conference wins. When matched up against a team from a power conference, KSU will have its hands full.
Players You Should Care About:  Guard Al Fisher was just named the MAC player of the year averaging over 14 points and four assists per game. He doesn’t miss from the line and doesn’t make many mistakes. While not huge, forwards Mike Scott and Hamin Quaintance are strong, at times, on the boards combining for close to 14 rebounds per game.
Best Wins: Illinois State 65-59; George Mason 73-55; Akron 74-55 (MAC Championship)
Worst Losses:  Detroit 61-60; at Bowling Green 89-83  
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Out in the first round. KSU's D isn't as good as UNLV's.


No. 5 Clemson Tigers – ACC (24-9, 10-6 in the ACC) 
Basically: Head coach Oliver Purnell has taken the program from the bottom to respectability in a few years with an experienced group that battled its way off the bubble with a decent ACC season and a run to the conference championship game where it lost to North Carolina. There’s no shame in finishing third in the regular season behind the Tar Heels and Duke, but even with the good talent in place, and with so much on the line late in the year, losses at Miami, Florida State and Georgia Tech made it a tougher road to get in than it should’ve been. The veterans are there, there’s good depth, the defense is nasty, and there’s plenty of excitement after missing out on the post-season fun for the last ten years. This Clemson team won’t just be happy to break the drought.
Strengths: Pressure defense. The ACC’s most aggressive D forces tons of mistakes to fuel the offense. One of the tournament’s most balanced scoring teams, there are six strong options and no one player who’ll bring down the offense if he isn’t hot. Any team with average, sloppy guards will get destroyed, but while Clemson takes it away …
Weaknesses: … it also gives it up. This isn’t exactly a stingy offense turning it over around 15 times per game, and fouls have been a big problem all year. Worst of all, this is a horrific free-throw shooting bunch (as evidenced in the ACC Championship), and it will likely be the Achilles heel in a tight pressure moment. There’s a ceiling on how far a team can go when it keeps losing the free-throw shooting margin.
Players You Should Care About: One of the ACC’s best sixth men throughout the first part of his career, junior K.C. Rivers has blossomed into Clemson’s best all-around weapon with a tremendous stroke from the outside and good quickness to get to the basket. While he’s not all that huge at 6-5 and 215 pounds, he’s a solid rebounder. Rivers leads the team in scoring, and he might have to do even more if No. 2 scorer Cliff Hammonds has problems with a broken wrist on his non-shooting hand. While it wasn’t an immediate issue, it’s not a plus considering he’s the team’s leading assist man.
Best Wins: Purdue 61-58; Miami 79-69  
Worst Losses: Charlotte 82-72; at Georgia Tech 80-75
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Upset. Villanova is an awful, awful first round opponent for a Tiger team that makes way too many mistakes.

No. 12 Villanova Wildcats – Big East (20-12, 9-9 in the Big East) 
Basically: A mid-season five-game losing streak dropping six in seven games put the Wildcats on the outside of the bubble, but with just enough decent wins over teams like Pitt, West Virginia, and with a blowout over Syracuse in the Big East tournament, they just barely got in. Hot to start the year with a 10-1 record, inconsistency has been the norm. More than anything else, there hasn’t been any one thing to rely on game in and game out and there haven’t been enough good performances against the better Big East teams.
Strengths: Forcing mistakes. The guard-oriented attack is fantastic at pressuring the ball and forcing steals, and it’s not that bad at making the extra pass to keep the offense moving. In a perfect world the guards are running and getting on the move and to the free throw line. The Wildcats hit an impressive 72% of their free throws, but …
Weaknesses: There are way, way too many fouls. There’s a lot of hacking going on inside and out, and for a team that doesn’t shoot particularly well, getting down early is usually a death sentence. There’s no consistent inside presence to feed the ball to on a regular basis.
Players You Should Care About: This isn’t a three-point shooting team, but what production there is usually comes from sophomore Scottie Reynolds. Last year’s Big East Rookie of the Year had an even better year, but he faded a bit down the stretch. When he was nailing the three, like he did against Syracuse, the Wildcat offense had a weapon to rely on every time down the court. Good enough to get to the hoop any time he wants to and quick enough to create his own outside shot, he has to take over early.
Best Wins: Pitt 64-63; West Virginia 78-56
Worst Losses: at DePaul 84-76; at Cincinnati 69-66
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Second round loss to Vanderbilt. The defense will force Clemson to screw up, and the Tiger free throw shooting will be just bad enough for the Wildcats to get by.


No. 4 Vanderbilt Commodores – SEC (26-7, 10-6 in the SEC) 
Basically: Coming off a strong run to the Elite Eight, where it lost to in a one-point heartbreaker to Georgetown, Vandy came out red-hot with a 16-0 start before dropping four of its first five SEC games with all the losses on the road. To make the season even more bizarre and streaky, the Commodores ripped off seven straight wins, including a win over No. 1 Tennessee, and then lost a few days later to Arkansas. The Hogs struck again in the SEC tournament with an 81-75 win. Even so, thanks to 6-10 newcomer A.J. Ogilvy, the offense has an inside scorer to go along with the normal Vandy outside gunners, and now the team appears ready for another big tournament.
Strengths: Hitting from three. One of the best shooting teams in America, connecting on over 40% of its three point attempts, Vandy’s offense can turn a game around in a heartbeat, or can get back from almost any deficit. Just ask Kentucky, who got its doors blown off getting down 41-11 at halftime and got down by 43 in the second half when it couldn’t handle the Commodore shooting.
Weaknesses: Defense. Anyone who can score will do it without much of a problem on the porous Vandy D. The guards don’t cover anyone, there are no steals, and there’s little in the way of rebounding, so if the three point shooting runs dry, there will be big problems. Yes, Ogilvy can play inside, but this isn’t a team built for banging.
Players You Should Care About: Ogilvy, an import from Australia, is one of the few Commodores who doesn’t shoot from the outside, but that’s more than fine. He’s great at getting to the line, helps clean up the long range misses, and isn’t that bad a passer. On the flip-side to Mr. Inside is Mr. Outside, Shan Foster, who can stroke it from anywhere. When he’s on, he’s breathtaking nailing nine of 15 from three in a 42-point outing against Mississippi State. He went from being a top scorer to a red-hot gunner at the right time.
Best Wins: Tennessee 72-69; Mississippi State 86-85 OT
Worst Losses: at Mississippi 74-58; at Alabama 78-73 OT
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction:
Sweet 16 before losing Kansas. The Commodores will simply outgun Sienna and the Clemson/Villanova winner, but Kansas will be too potent. The Vandy D will give up 90 to the Jayhawks.

No. 13 Siena Saints – MAAC (22-10, 13-5 in the MAAC) 
Basically: Siena might not do much in the tournament, and it might not be all that great, but it’s a whole bunch of fun to watch. If nothing else it’ll go down swinging with one of the best offenses in America. It’s been a strange team able to beat Stanford and its two seven-footers, the Lopez brothers, despite having no size whatsoever. Keeping things fast paced is its style, but it got obliterated by 44 against Memphis and there have been losses to the dregs, Fairfield and Manhattan, and a blowout win over Rider in the MAAC Championship. While flaky, the firepower is there to make things interesting.
Strengths: Scoring. Up and down the floor, keeping things moving, and shooting, shooting; shooting, Siena is all about offense. Without any inside presence, and not enough three point shooting considering there are guards who can hit from outside, the Saints have to get involved in a street game and run, run, and keep running. Even with all the scoring and all the offensive punch, this is a stingy team with the ball and there aren’t many fouls committed.
Weaknesses: Defense and size. Anyone who can rebound will do it without breathing hard. Without any real size inside, the Saints get outboarded by everyone and they get picked apart inside the three. .Oh sure, there will be points put on the board, but they’ll give them up just as quickly.
Players You Should Care About: There’s a three-man scoring attack that keeps defenses guessing. Edwin Ubiles, Kenny Hasbrouck and Alex Franklin all average over 15 points per game and all can get take over the offense. While decent from midrange, Franklin does most of his work inside. Ubiles was one of the MAAC’s best players and a pure scorer who makes things happen. Hasbrouck does a little of everything with a great burst to the bucket and a good outside game.
Best Wins: Stanford 79-67; Rider 74-53 (MAAC Championship)
Worst Losses: Fairfield 53-52; at Manhattan 73-72
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction:
The Saints will get their licks in against Vandy in a fun shootout, but they won't have enough in the bag to pull out the upset. It'll be close, though.


No. 2 Georgetown Hoyas – Big East (27-5, 15-3 in the Big East) 
Basically: The Big East regular season champion has the makeup to get back to the Final Four, but does it have the talent? Big East Player of the Year Jeff Green left early for the NBA, but 7-2 NBA center Roy Hibbert didn’t, choosing to return for his senior season giving the team a focal point to work around. This might not be last year’s team with Green gone, but it finds ways to hold together through tough games and has gotten tighter as the season has gone on, the Big East tournament final loss to Pitt notwithstanding. Considering how nasty the Big East has been, getting through the wars and finishing on top (or in second if you believe the tournament means more than the regular season) shows how tough the Hoyas are, but unless players like DaJuan Summers and Jonathan Wallace can do even more to help out Hibbert, there might be a ceiling on how high they can go.
Strengths: Defense. Helped mostly by the big man in the middle, Hoya opponents shoot just 36%, lowest in the nation. The guards might not force a ton of mistakes, but they’re ultra-aggressive and tough as nails. While this isn’t a high-octane offensive team, it shoots well inside and out with just enough balance to handle almost any defense. It’s a good working formula: play great defense, take the open shot, and don’t turn the ball over. It works.
Weaknesses: Free throw shooting. There’s a problem when you play in tight defensive games like the Hoyas are going to want to do; you have to come through on the line. It hasn’t been a killer so far, but the mediocre free throw shooting, averaging around 67%, might be just enough of an Achilles heel to get upset.
Players You Should Care About: Hibbert has been fine, but has he been NBA lottery dominant? At times, yeah. He’s been a more consistent scorer over the second half of the season while becoming an even stronger defensive presence, but he’s not the issue. Summers, a 6-8 forward was supposed to fill the void left by Green’s departure, but it hasn’t quite happened. While he’s been fine, he went scoreless in a loss at Pitt, scored nine in the Big East final, struggled in key late wins over Marquette and Louisville, and was non-existent in an earlier loss to the Cardinals. The Hoyas can get by most teams as is, but to beat the really big boys, Summers has to be a breakout star.
Best Wins: Notre Dame 84-65; Louisville 55-52
Worst Losses: at Pitt 69-60; at Syracuse 77-70
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Sweet 16 loss to Wisconsin. The Badgers and Hoyas might play the toughest defensive game of the tournament. The Badgers will make their free throws, the Hoyas will miss theirs.

No. 15 UMBC Retrievers – America East (24-8, 13-3 in America East) 
Basically: The best team in the America East conference all season long, UMBC proved it by blowing away Hartford 82-65 to earn the automatic bid. With a four player offensive attack, led by three transfers Ray Barbosa, Darryl Proctor and Cavell Johnson, the Retrievers play smart and efficient with a slew of options to work into the attack. While there weren’t any wins of note, they played relatively well at Ohio State and had no real problems in conference play with the three league losses coming by a total of seven points. Outside of a tough one-point loss at Hartford, they won 12 of their final 13 games.
Strengths: Holding on to the ball. Considering the Retrievers aren’t afraid to move it and aren’t shy about chucking from deep, they’re shockingly good at not screwing up turning it over a mere 9.5 times per game, the fewest in the nation. Great at moving the ball around, they’re excellent at finding the open man and knocking down the three.
Weaknesses: Rebounding. There are only two players with any sort of size, Tyler Massey and Uwem Eshietedoho, and they almost never play. This is a small, quick team that’ll be destroyed on the boards by anyone with any talent and beef upfront. The outside shots have to fall because there won’t be many second chances for put backs. Proctor’s the team’s best rebounder and he’s only 6-4.
Players You Should Care About: Barbosa’s the team’s best scorer, but it was Proctor who went ballistic down the stretch. After being held to six points in a win over Boston University, he cranked out 22, 14, 21, 14, 17 and 17 points over a six-game stretch before hitting ten of 14 shots on the way to a 23-point outing in the title game. While he’s not big, he’s not an outside shooter by any stretch; his points come on the inside.
Best Wins: at American 83-68; Hartford 82-65 (America East Championship)
Worst Losses: at Lafayette 87-84 OT; Binghamton 62-59
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Pushed out early by Georgetown. The Hoyas will dominate on the boards.


No. 7 Gonzaga Bulldogs – West Coast (25-7, 13-1 in the West Coast) 
Basically: Is Gonzaga now getting by on reputation? After almost a decade in the spotlight, the Bulldogs have no problem in the respect department, but while they had a few nice wins, they didn’t beat the top teams on the schedule losing to Washington State, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Memphis. Even so, they rolled through the West Coast Conference on their way to yet another title, but San Diego got in the way in the league title game. The Zags might not be the WCC champs, but they’ll once again be a dangerous out with a deep, balanced team that shoots lights-out and is fantastic on the boards.
Strengths: Shooting. Great inside and out, the Bulldogs have options to bomb away from three, to produce on the inside, in transition, and everywhere in between. While good defenses can slow things down, like Washington State and San Diego were able to do, this is a deep offensive attack that can open it up on anyone.
Weaknesses: Actually winning the big games. Oh sure, it’s great to put up stats against Loyola Marymount, Portland and Pepperdine, but coming up with the big wins have been tough. Getting focused shouldn’t be a problem, but can the Zags just turn it back on after getting beaten by San Diego? Against the above-average teams, they tend to play to the competition and haven’t done anything that special.
Players You Should Care About: There are several offensive weapons to deal with, but the focus has to be on junior point guard Jeremy Pargo, the team’s leading assist man and second leading scorer. Tough as nails, he’s not afraid to go inside and mix it up, while he’s good at shooting from midrange. He has to find his three-point shot again after going 3-for-27 in the last seven games.
Best Wins: at Connecticut 85-82; St. Mary’s 88-76
Worst Losses: Texas Tech 73-63, San Diego 69-62 (WCC Championship)
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: One and done. Gonzaga has been inconsistent all season long, and it won't have an answer for Davidson's Stephen Curry.

No. 10 Davidson Wildcats – Southern (26-6, 20-0 in the Southern) 
Basically: Part of the joy of the NCAA Tournament is seeing how the under-the-radar little guys do on the biggest stage. Davidson, led by deadly scorer Stephen Curry, went 20-0 in the Southern Conference, blew through the league tournament, and comes in on a 22-game winning streak, but it beat absolutely no one. However, the Wildcats pushed Duke in a six-point loss, lost to North Carolina by four, and battled UCLA before getting blown away late. The sneaky-sleeper of last year got blasted as a 13-seed by Maryland, but this year’s team is much better and much more dangerous.
Strengths: Curry. The son of former NBA star Dell Curry was the SoCon’s best player as a freshman, and continued his rise with a fantastic second season despite being the target of every defense. While he looks like he should break in half at 6-3 and a slight 180 pounds, he’s tough to the hoop and can score on anyone. He put up 24 on North Carolina, 20 on Duke, and was held to “just” 15 by UCLA. The only other times he’s been kept in check have been in blowouts when he came out early.
Weaknesses: The competition. After weeks of fattening up on the mediocre, what’s going to happen when the Wildcats have to face a real live team again? There have been a few close games, but they haven’t been really tested in 2008.
Players You Should Care About: Curry is the signature star, and he has his bodyguards. Boris Meno, Thomas Sander, and Andrew Lovedale are 6-8 bangers who’ll each grab about five rebounds and beat up everyone inside. However, these aren’t the college basketball version of the Hanson brothers; they can all score a little bit. While those three make things happen inside, Jason Richards is the outside bomber. Feeding off the attention paid to Curry, Richards is the top assist man and most dangerous three-point threat, even though he closed out the year connecting on one of his last 13 attempts.
Best Wins: at Winthrop 60-47; Elon 65-49 (Southern Championship) 
Worst Losses: at Western Michigan 83-76; at Charlotte 75-68
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Second round loss to Georgetown. Curry will get his, but the front line isn't there to pull off an upset to get to the Sweet Sixteen.


No. 3 Wisconsin Badgers – Big Ten (29-4, 16-2 in the Big Ten) 
Basically: In what might have been Bo Ryan’s finest coaching job yet, Wisconsin went from being a preseason afterthought, at best a middle of the pack Big Ten pick, to the regular season and tournament champion with no stars and absolutely no pizzazz. With a blend of suffocating defense and timely play, especially on the road, the Badgers did more than just rebuild, it came together to become a regular in the top ten. While this is a limited team, it doesn’t screw up, is ultra-efficient offensively, and is as well coached as any in the nation. It also annoys the heck out of everyone with its …
Strengths: Defense, defense, defense. The nation’s leader throughout the year in scoring D, allowing teams to average around 54 points per game, the Badgers don’t let offenses get into any sort of a rhythm. That’s a function of a slowwwwww, deliberate offense which tends to lull teams to sleep and forces mistakes when opposing teams can’t run. More than anything else, they don’t allow offensive rebounds and rarely put anyone on the line ranking among the top five teams in the country in fewest fouls committed.
Weaknesses: There isn’t even a hint of offensive explosion. Everything revolves around the defense, but when opponents start to get hot and start to ramp up the tempo, the Badgers have a hard time keeping up. It’s no coincidence that they’re 29-1 when holding opponents to under 70 points, and 0-3 when allowing more than 70. For good and bad, the offense spreads the wealth around and doesn’t have a pure scorer.
Players You Should Care About: Brian Butch, a.k.a. The Polar Bear, didn’t get in on the fun of last year’s post-season having dislocated his elbow in an ugly fall against Ohio State late in the year. Now, the near-seven footer has done a little bit of everything as the team’s leading scorer, rebounder, and leader. The former McDonald’s All-American has finally lived up to his potential after having overcome a slew of setbacks from injuries, to a battle with mono, to the dreaded “overrated” tag. On a deep team of jack-of-all-trade players, Butch is the one who has to set the tone both on the boards and with the big shot.
Best Wins: at Texas 67-66; at Indiana 68-66; Illinois 61-48 (Big Ten Championship) 
Worst Losses: Marquette 81-76; Purdue 72-67
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction:
Elite Eight. Screwed over with a third seed, the Badgers will be properly motivated for a big run before getting knocked out by Kansas. However, it'll be a nightmare to get out of the first round.

No. 14 Cal State Fullerton Titans – Big West (24-8, 12-4 in the Big West) 
Basically: If you’re looking for a deep, dark sleeper that could get silly-hot for a weekend and pull off some mega-upsets to be the story of the first round, the Big West champions have a puncher’s chance of being it. This isn’t a very good team, but it’s a whole bunch of fun with one of the nation’s most potent offenses on a big-time hot streak. Winners of their last six and 14 of their last 16, the Titans bombed their way into the tournament after a stunningly easy run through the Big West post-season. However, they haven’t really done much against the good teams this year losing to the other two regular season co-champions, UC Santa Barbara twice while going 2-1 vs. Cal State Northridge. There are no non-conference wins of note with the one big moment, a November date with Arizona, a 91-65 disaster. However, no one wants to face them because of their …
Strengths: Offense. Get ready see some running and some intense pressure as the quick guards are great at forcing steals as Bob Burton’s team is all about keeping things moving and forcing the action. Fifth in the nation in scoring averaging close to 83 points per game, the Titans are more than happy to get in a shootout, and ecstatic when anyone tries to get into a three-point shooting contest.
Weaknesses: Size. Fullerton has some big guys, but they don’t play. On quickness and hustle there are plenty of rebounds and a not-that-bad defense (at times) because of all the steals, but anyone who wants to get to the basket can do it without a problem. Opponents shoot 47% from the field and there will be plenty of easy scores from everywhere on the floor.
Players You Should Care About: Despite leading the team with 19.8 points per game to go along with three rebounds per outing, 5-11, 185-pound junior Josh Akognon didn’t make the All-Big West team. He seemed intent on proving everyone wrong by scoring 57 points in the three-game tournament helped by nailing eight of 19 from three. He needs to put up big numbers, while Frank Robinson and Scott Cutley have to do all the dirty work on the boards. The Titans are out instantly if those two don’t combine for at least 15 rebounds.
Best Wins: Cal State Northridge 83-68; UC Irvine 81-66 (Big West Championship)
Worst Losses: Central Michigan 79-76; at Arizona 91-65
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Out right away, but the Titans will throw a big-time scare into Wisconsin. There just isn't the interior to handle the Badger big front.


No. 6 USC Trojans – Pac 10 (21-11, 11-7 in the Pac 10) 
Basically: Fla-keee. After a nice 25-win season and a Sweet 16 run, the Trojans were supposed to overcome some NBA losses with top freshman O.J. Mayo coming to town. And then the tone was set for the season with a 96-81 loss to Mercer in the opener. While there were tough battles in losses to Kansas and Memphis, when Tim Floyd’s club proved it could play with anyone in the nation, there were blowout losses to Washington State, a home blasting from Arizona, and an ugly road performance against Arizona State. Just when the team appeared to be the working definition of On The Bubble, it blew out Stanford and had a nice showing in the Pac 10 tournament avenging the ASU loss and battling UCLA in a 57-54 semifinal loss. This is one of the tournament’s most athletic teams, and it’s not just Mayo, but while it could beat anyone, it could also get bounced right away.
Strengths: Getting to the basket. This isn’t a bad mid-to-outside shooting team, and it hits the threes when it chooses to take them, but the offense revolves around getting in close and making things happen. While this might seem like a fun offensive attack, and it is, its bread is buttered on defense with an aggressive style that doesn’t take the ball away, but it doesn’t commit fouls, either.
Weaknesses: Passing. There’s a lot of one-on-one offense with little extra passing to make things happen. Since this isn’t necessarily an outside shooting team, crisp passing isn’t quite at a premium, but if the defense isn’t generating points off transition, and it Mayo isn’t on, the offense struggles.
Players You Should Care About: No, he’s not Kobe Bryant, but Mayo has been a consistent scorer who can score inside and out, and while he’s hardly a banger, he’s a slippery rebounder who always seems to be around the ball. UCLA was able to shut him down late in the year with a four-point outing in 40 minutes, but that was his only game under 12 points. Yes, he’s the real deal who has gotten better as the season has gone on. Like Mayo, Davon Jefferson will be off to the NBA next year. After initially signing with UNLV, he had academic troubles before coming to USC, and while he hasn’t been a consistent scorer, he’s been a good rebounder and a key inside playmaker.
Best Wins: at UCLA 72-63; Stanford 77-64
Worst Losses: Mercer 96-81; at Arizona State 80-66
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Loss to Wisconsin in the second round. The Trojans will break down against the Badger D.

No. 11 Kansas State Wildcats – Big 12 (20-11, 10-6 in the Big 12) 
Basically: After missing out on last year’s tournament despite a 23-12 record, the Wildcats are going dancing this time even after Bob Huggins bolted to take the head coaching job at West Virginia. Led by the walking double-double Michael Beasley and running mate Bill Walker, this is a high-scoring, tough rebounding team with the type of individual talents who can come up with a deep run. However, the momentum has to turn around after a rough final month of the regular season, hurt most by a streak of five losses in six games, and a 63-60 loss to Texas A&M in the Big 12 tournament.
Strengths: Rebounding. Start with the 12.4 a game from Mr. Beasley and go from there. The guards are good at getting to the glass fueling an effective transition game. Good at moving the ball around, everyone can pass and everyone in the regular lineup is decent at making sure the open man gets the ball. Or, more often than not, everyone is good at getting it to Beasley.
Weaknesses: Outside shooting. The Wildcats have three major flaws that could turn into serious issues early in the tournament. There are too many turnovers, way too many fouls, and not enough consistency from three. There’s lots of clanking going on from behind the arc, but the offense keeps trying. It helps to have a good group of rebounders to clean up the mess.
Players You Should Care About: While Beasley is the main attraction, Walker is also an interesting NBA prospect, or he was before tearing his ACL early in the 2006-2007 season. He came back to clean up with all the attention paid to B-Easy with 31 point outings against Xavier and Baylor (both losses) while also turning into a killer on the boards. Of course, the Wildcats will only go as far as Beasley, the likely No. 1 pick in the next NBA draft if/when he comes out early, takes them. Every bit as good as the hype able to dominant inside and finish on the break, he’s been an unstoppable scoring force with only two games with fewer than 15 points.
Best Wins: at Oklahoma 84-82; Kansas 84-75
Worst Losses: at Missouri 77-74; at Nebraska 71-64
Pete Fiutak's Tournament Prediction: Loss to USC in the first round. Beasley will get his, but the Trojans will win in a fantastic battle.

 

  



Story Tools
Top Stories 
Search Stories 
Discuss on Forums