Fiu, Cirminiello, Mitchell on TV - Campus Insiders | Buy College Football Tickets

2008 Missouri Preview - Offense
Missouri QB Chase Daniel
Missouri QB Chase Daniel
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted May 2, 2008


CollegeFootballNews.com 2008 Preview - Missouri Tiger Offense

Missouri Tigers

Preview 2008 - Offense

- 2008 CFN Missouri Preview | 2008 Missouri Offense
-
2008 Missouri Defense | 2008 Missouri Depth Chart
-
2007 CFN Missouri Preview | 2006 CFN Missouri Preview 

What you need to know:
If everyone plays as well as expected, this will once again be one of the five most productive offenses in the nation. It all starts with Heisman finalist Chase Daniel, an ultra-efficient passer who knows the offense backwards and forwards. Now in his third year as the starter and with 37 games under his belt, he'll make his dizzying array of weapons shine. The receiving corps is loaded with all-around playmaker Jeremy Maclin and tight end Chase Coffman, who'll be healthy again to start the year, unlike last season, while Danario Alexander and Tommy Saunders are strong targets to work with. The running backs will be fine with a good combination of players to rotate around, and the line should be fantastic if the starting five can stay healthy.

Returning Leaders
Passing: Chase Daniel
384-563, 4,306 yds, 33 TD, 11 INT
Rushing: Jeremy Maclin
51 carries, 375 yds, 4 TD
Receiving: Jeremy Maclin
80 catches, 1,055 yds, 9 TD

Star of the offense: Senior QB Chase Daniel
Player who has to step up and become a star: Sophomore C Tim Barnes
Unsung star on the rise: Sophomore RB Derrick Washington and redshirt freshman RB De'Vion Moore
Best pro prospect: Sophomore WR Jeremy Maclin
Top three all-star candidates: 1) Daniel, 2) Maclin, 3)
TE Chase Coffman
Strength of the offense: Experience, passing game
Weakness of the offense:
Offensive line depth, pure power runner

Quarterbacks

Projected Starter
:
Senior Chase Daniel was becoming a special player after a fantastic sophomore season, and then it all came together in a magical campaign when he completed 68% of his passes for 4,306 yards and 33 touchdowns with 11 interceptions, while also running for 253 yards and four scores. The 6-0, 225-pounder is a better all-around athlete than he looks and has a deadly accurate arm whether in the pocket or on the move. If you're looking for a comparison, he's a puffier Drew Brees; they're both the same height and their college careers are similar. The main difference is Brees's arm; it's a big more live, but the pro scouts are going to start scrutinizing Daniel in the same way they did a few years ago when they had to travel to West Lafayette. While he couldn't solve Oklahoma and he didn't do much, mainly because he didn't need to, against Arkansas in the Cotton Bowl, Daniel did a far better job of letting everyone else do the work. As a sophomore, he pressed too much and tried to do too much on his own, and it showed. He had far better command of the offense last season and did a great job of putting the ball in places where his weapons could do something with it. In general, the less he's running, the better the offense is working because he's seeing the defense better; the Oklahoma games showed that.

Projected Top Reserves: 6-5, 220-pound senior Chase Patton was a top-shelf recruit for the program coming out of the Columbia area, but he got passed over with the emergence of Daniel and hasn't been able to see too much of the field. The 2003 Missouri Player of the Year is 6-5, 220-pounds and mobile, but he hasn't been able to see much of the field completing six of 13 passes for 60 yards with an interception. An Elite 11 high school talent who could've gone to Tennessee or UCLA, it's been a major shock that he didn't transfer; he has the skills to have been a quality starter somewhere.

Sophomore Dominic Grooms is a 6-1, 195-pound athlete who can throw on the move while providing more mobility than Daniel or Patton. A key scout teamer last season, he's battling to see time as the No. 2 quarterback as he tries to position himself for the 2009 starting job. While he's compared in styles for former Mizzou start Brad Smith, he's not as big.
 
Watch Out For ... an interesting philosophical battle for the No. 2 job. Patton has been a good soldier after being hailed as the star quarterback prospect who was going to take Mizzou to the level Daniel has, and the coaching staff is going to want to get him a little playing time. However, outside of an injury to Daniel, the future of the team would be better served by getting Grooms some quality time for next year.
Strength: Experience. Not only is this Daniel's third year as the starter, but Patton is more than ready to step in and play if needed. Having an option like Grooms to deal with isn't a bad thing.
Weakness: True, live-fire backup experience. Patton might be ready from all the time he's had in the system, but he hasn't had any real pressure on him yet. Even with all his talent and skills, does he have "it" for a big game if Daniel goes down for a time? Grooms hasn't done anything on the field, and incoming freshman Blaine Gabbert is obviously green.
Outlook: Daniel will once again be in the hunt for the Heisman. With the knowledge of the offense and all his experience, he's a special college player who'll make everyone around him better. Patton is a decent No. 2 option to count on in a pinch, while Grooms has the athleticism and X factor skills to make defensive coordinators worry if he gets thrown into the mix for a few plays here and there.
Rating: 10


Running Backs

Projected Starter
:
Several backs will see the ball in a running-back-by-committee approach, but 5-9, 200-pound senior Jimmy Jackson will likely get the starting nod. The pounder is the most experienced returning back, but he was little used last season outside of mop-up time finishing with 331 yards and six touchdowns, with three coming in the blowout over Texas Tech when he got the start in place of Tony Temple. While he's quick enough to bounce to the outside, he's a between-the-tackles runner.

Projected Top Reserves: Sophomore Derrick Washington was a little bit of work last season running for 184 yards and a touchdown, but he was at his best as a short-range receiver catching ten passes for 70 yards with a score. The 5-11, 215-pounder was the team's best back in spring ball and will be neck-and-neck with Jackson going into fall practices for the number one spot. While he doesn't have the speed of De'Vion Moore and he might not be the pounder that Jackson is, he's the best all-around option because of his hands.

5-9, 195-pound redshirt freshman De'Vion Moore showed in spring ball that he's ready to be a part of the rotation. An excellent outside runner with tremendous quickness and phenomenal straight line speed, he could be the home run hitter out of the backfield that the Tigers have been missing, at least when Jeremy Maclin isn't getting the ball. 
 
Watch Out For ... running back by committee. That was supposed to happen last year but Tony Temple proved to be too effective. Now the young backs like Washington and Moore are ready to shine. Each has the potential to be every bit as good as Temple was.
Strength: Quickness. Missouri recruits to a type. Its backs are all around 5-9 and 200 pounds with tremendous lateral quickness and speed through the hole. There might not be a lot of breakaway runs, even though Moore has the potential to give the offense just that, but there are plenty of four and five yards dashes through the hole.
Weakness: A workhorse. While the Tigers might have three excellent backs, do they have one who can carry the load when needed? Temple was able to carry the offense from time to time when he had to, and while he wasn't exactly a workhorse, he was almost always effective when healthy. One back needs to step up and be the crunch-time guy.
Outlook: While many will lament the loss of Temple, who ran for 1,039 yards and 12 touchdowns, the team didn't really need him as much as it might have appeared. Basically, he's replaceable. Jackson isn't a special back by any stretch, but he can run for ten carries a game and be an effective power option. Moore and Washington have the upside to make the running game more than just an accessory for the passing attack.
Rating: 7.5


Receivers

Projected Starters
:
Every rising program has a special talent who ends up coming from out of nowhere to become a major difference maker. Sophomore Jeremy Maclin was a very good recruit for Missouri, but he wasn't an elite, can't-miss, All-America caliber one, and he appeared to take a major step back after hurting his knee in a 2006 summer practice to keep him on the sidelines. And then he came back healthy to turn in one of the greatest freshman seasons in the history of college football setting the NCAA record for all-purposed yards by a freshman by amassing 2,776. He caught 80 passes for 1,055 yards and nine touchdowns, ran for 375 yards (second on the team) and four scores, averaged 24.2 yards per kickoff return, with a touchdown, and averaged 12.3 yards per punt return with two scores. At 6-1 and 200 pounds he has good size to go along with his speed and quickness. Not just a home-run hitter, he was a consistent all-around weapon who excelled whenever he got the ball in his hands. He'll start at the H position, but he'll move around to see action in a variety of ways.

The Tigers might lose Martin Rucker, who led the team in receptions, but s more than fine with the return of senior Chase Coffman. The team's third leading receiver, with 52 catches for 531 yards and seven touchdowns, was never quite right all of last season as an ankle injury kept him from being the explosive downfield target he was in his first two seasons. Now that he's healthy, he'll be a matchup nightmare again with soft hands, tremendous route running ability, and the strength to fight off defenders for the ball. For his career, he has 157 catches for 1672 yards and 20 touchdowns; he'll be on the short list for the Mackey Award.

When healthy, junior Danario Alexander is one of the team's most dangerous receivers. At 6-5 and 210 pounds, he has the size to outjump and outmuscle most defensive backs, while has has tremendous deep speed and excellent athleticism. He caught 37 passes for 417 yards and three touchdowns, averaging 11.3 yards per grab, but he missed the first part of the season with a broken wrist and tore up his knee in the Big 12 title game. While he was out this spring, he's expected to be back this fall to start at the outside X position.

6-0, 210-pound senior Tommy Saunders is a dependable veteran who caught 41 passes for 397 yards and a touchdown at the inside Z position. The former walk-on is a good athlete with great hands who isn't afraid to make the tough catches. He might not be a go-to guy, but he's a steady producer good for a few grabs a game.

Projected Top Reserves: Working at the outside X position until Alexander is 100% is 6-1, 180-pound junior Jared Perry, a tremendously talented prospect who hasn't been able to break out yet. He showed tremendous potential with a great freshman season catching 37 passes for 439 yards and three touchdowns, but he was lost in the shuffle last season making just 13 catches for 152 yards. He has the deep speed and the potential to be dangerous. Now he needs the ball to start coming his away.

Senior Earl Goldsmith has been a part-time running back with 92 yards last season, and now he's being moved to receiver to play behind Saunders at the inside Z position. The 5-9, 200-pounder could move back to running back if needed, but he'd be the fourth man in the mix. This way he can get the ball in his hands more and make a bigger impact.

Getting ready to become the main tight end in 2009 will be junior Jon Gissinger, a 6-3, 240-pounder who hasn't been able to see much action yet. He'll likely be the team's main long snapper, but he'll also make an impact as a receiver with good hands and nice route running skills. Chase Daniel's roommate, he'll be sure to see a few passes come his way this year.

Watch Out For ... Perry. With Will Franklin gone the team needs more threats to push the passing game deep. Even when Alexander is healthy, Perry will play a bigger role.
Strength: Talent. Amazingly enough, the offense lost its best deep threat in Franklin, and its leading receiver in Rucker, and could be even better if Perry and Alexander step up at the X position. Coffman will be healthier, Maclin will be Maclin, and Saunders will be as steady as they come. There's a vast array of weapons to work with.
Weakness: Not much. There are steady, exciting playmakers at all the positions, promising backups, and young players waiting in the wings for a chance at more playing time. The only possible knock is the lack of a sure-thing, proven deep receiver. Franklin only did one thing, but he did that one thing well.
Outlook: If Maclin does what he did last year and Coffman is 100% healthy again, this will be an unstoppable group with too many weapons for most defenses to deal with. The coaching staff will have its choice of formations with so many options and so many decent targets to get involved. Maclin will be moved around to several spots to get the ball as much as possible, while Coffman should be an 80-catch playmaker.
Rating: 9.5

Offensive Linemen

Projected Starters
:
There are two big holes to fill at left tackle, where Tyler Luellen owned the job, and at center, where Adam Spieker was a great quarterback for the front line. All eyes will mostly be on junior Dain Wise at the tackle spot as he'll have the job of protecting Chase Daniel's back. The 6-5, 305 pounder has played at several different positions and will get the first look at replacing Luellen. He doesn't have a lock on the job by a long shot, but he has the size and the experience to be the favorite.

Taking over in the middle will likely be sophomore Tim Barnes, a 6-5, 305-pound top-shelf recruit who has the potential to be the team's next great lineman. Originally a guard, he switched to the middle last year and saw a little bit of time behind Spieker. Bigger than Spieker, he could grow into even more of a force for the ground game; the talent level isn't a question.

6-5, 305-pound Ryan Madison returns to his spot at left guard for the third year in a row and should be the veteran leader of the front five. He's a steady, consistent run blocker who has the most experience of anyone on the line. Extremely strong, he's the one the team will work behind for the hard yards.

The right side of the line is set with the return of junior guard Kurtis Gregory and senior tackle Colin Brown after both started every game. Brown is one of the Big 12's best linemen and the star of the show earning honorable mention All-Big 12 honors and even a few first and second team mentions from a few outlets. At 6-8 and 325 pounds, he's a huge blocker who overcame a shoulder injury to become a rock at tackle. The former walk-on can play guard if needed using his excellent combination of side and athleticism.

The 6-5, 305-pound Gregory earned honorable mention All-Big 12 honors is tackle-quick to go along with his good size. A question mark going into last season after suffering shoulder and knee injuries, he turned into a dependable all-around blocker.

Projected Top Reserves: While Wise is expected to become a rock at left tackle, he'll be pushed by promising redshirt freshman Elvis Fisher. With a world of upside, he has excellent athleticism and quickness, but he needs a little more seasoning. He'll get it. If he doesn't end up starting, he'll see plenty of meaningful plays.

6-54, 285-pond redshirt freshman J.T. Beasley was one of the team's highest rated recruits last season and now will battle for time behind Barnes in the middle. The finalist for Tennessee's Mr. Football will quickly get off the bench and into the mix even if Barnes turns out to be an instant star.
 
Watch Out For ... the new starters to be more than fine. Losing Luellen and Spieker isn't a plus, but Wise and Barnes are highly-touted prospects who are ready to step in and produce. They might not be all-stars right away, but they'll come up with strong seasons.
Strength: Talent. After years of recruiting solid linemen, Pinkel and his staff started to get the better talents. It's all coming together as the Tigers are able to replace good players with other strong producers.
Weakness: Veteran depth. There isn't much of any. Four redshirt freshman and an untested sophomore comprise the second team. There's potential and promise among the young players, but there will be big problems if injuries strike early on.
Outlook: Three good starters return and two excellent new prospects are ready to step in and fill the holes at center and left tackle. The Tiger line was fantastic last season as it kept Chase Daniel clean and powered over everyone in the running game. All will be fine as long as everyone is healthy. The backups need time and seasoning before they'll be remotely ready to step in. The starting five will do everything well.
Rating: 8

 

Related Stories
2008 CFN Missouri Preview
 -by CollegeFootballNews.com  May 2, 2008
2008 Missouri Preview - Defense
 -by CollegeFootballNews.com  May 2, 2008
2008 Missouri Preview – Depth Chart
 -by CollegeFootballNews.com  May 2, 2008








Add Topics to My HotList
Get free email alerts with news about your favorite topics. Click link to add to My HotList.
Football > Missouri
[View My HotList]