Draft Blog - What's Better, Stats or Size?
Kansas State QB Josh Freeman
Kansas State QB Josh Freeman
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Mar 29, 2009


Physical Freaks versus Stat Geeks ... What's better, great stats or great size and physical skills? Hunter Ansley analyzes the production vs. the potential in his NFL Draft Blog.

2009 NFL Draft Blog

Physical Or The Statistical ... Which Option Is Better?


By Hunter Ansley 

- 2009 NFL Combine Numbers
Quarterbacks | Running Backs & Fullbacks | Receivers
Tight Ends | Centers & Guards | Off. Tackles

Def. Ends | Def. Tackles | Inside LBs | Outside LBs
Cornerbacks | Safeties


- 2009 NFL Draft Post-Workout Rankings
Quarterbacks | Running Backs | Fullbacks | Receivers | Tight Ends
Centers | Guards | Off. Tackles | Def. Ends | Def. Tackles
Inside LBs | Outside LBs | Cornerbacks | Safeties

Physical Freaks versus Stat Geeks

It’s one of the all-time classic draft debates.  No, not Leaf vs. Manning for the Colts.  Not even heart pills vs. a new Reebok track suit for Oakland’s Al Davis.  It’s production against potential.  Do you want a proven guy who lit up the scoreboard like Christmas at Clark Griswald’s house or a raw prospect with off-the-chart measurables who makes Mel Kiper giggle like a schoolgirl?  Sure, there are other important traits that can’t be measured by numbers on a page or digits on a stopwatch, but for now let’s just focus on these two.  Here’s a list of three physical freaks who grade out higher than their stat geek counterparts.  And vice versa.

Brawn over Brains

Physical Freak:  Josh Freeman, QB, Kansas State There’s not a quarterback in the entire draft with the total package of physical tools that Freeman possesses.  He’s 6-06 250 pounds, has an arm that could have tossed Kevin Costner farther than the catapult used in Robin Hood, and he moves surprisingly well.  He’s taken some heat for his low TD numbers, but Freeman’s got loads of experience in a pro-style system and never had the talent around him that someone like Mark Sanchez did.  It’s a good thing he’s so big; he put the whole Kansas State team on his back every Saturday.

Vs.

Stats Geek:  Graham Harrell, QB, Texas Tech – Harrell might as well spell his name s-y-s-t-e-m-q-b.  He put up 134 TDs and nearly 16,000 career yards in an offense that has cranked out some of the most productive quarterbacks in recent memory, but he will struggle to make a contribution at the next level.  He has marginal arm strength, a thin frame, and a bad habit of making bad reads under pressure.  Not to mention the fact that Mike Leach basically ruins all of his quarterbacks with that shotgun system he learned at “coaching school.”  It’s a little tougher to find your target when starting under center. 

Physical Freak:  Vontae Davis, CB, Illinois – Now that Malcolm Jenkins has shown that Shakira was right and hips don’t lie, especially the stiff kind, Davis is getting some consideration as the top corner in the draft.  The younger brother of fellow freak Vernon Davis is a heck of an athlete.  Big bro put on quite a show at the combine, and look where that got him drafted.  Vontae has unlimited potential, but consistency is still a concern.  True, he never cornered the market on interceptions, but you can bet your last doubloon on the fact that teams were often throwing the other way.  He’s got good size, good speed, and a real knack for recovering.

Vs.

Stats Geek:  Alphonso Smith, CB, Wake Forest – You don’t become the ACC’s all-time leader in picked passes by being a slouch.  Smith has been the consummate playmaker for Wake Forest throughout his career, and his size was never much of a problem.  After measuring in at under 5-09 and running a 4.57 at the combine it’s now officially an issue.  Smith will likely have to rent twin circus elephants that can hoist a banner announcing his 21 interceptions if he wants any chance of sneaking back into round one.  Sure, it’s not fair, and Smith will likely be a good corner even if he has to wear platforms, but his stock has definitely dropped.

Physical Freak:  Brian Cushing, LB, USC – There are concerns that Cushing has maxed out his potential due to heavy supplementation.  Is it just me, or is everyone seemingly taking that statement at face value without any thought to what it means?  Maxed out at 6-03 245 pounds with a reported 4.68 40 is not all that bad.  I seem to remember a certain Broncos linebacker by the name of Romanowski who was a creatine freak and one heck of football player.  Cushing has elite size and excellent playmaking ability.  He’ll be an asset to any team that picks him up.  And if not, he can always moonlight at the local GNC.

Vs.

Stats Geek:  James Laurinaitis, LB, Ohio State – Strange to think that a guy whose dad stole the limelight with the moniker “The Animal” is considered less than average when it comes to athleticism.  Laurinaitis may have measurables that send Al Davis running for the john, but a good football player is a good football player.  The former Ohio State linebacker’s 376 career tackles won’t get him taken as highly as Cushing.  Those instincts, however, will help him become a solid starter for years and a likely steal for any team that grabs him in round two.

Revenge of the Nerds

Stats Geek:  Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech It may not be fair to list Crabtree on the other side of the physical freak fence, but there is no denying his statistical prowess.  41 touchdown grabs in only two seasons?  Some of the guys projecting Crabtree to fall out of the top ten probably can’t even count to 41.  Here’s the deal:  with body control like that and hands that could put Stickum out of business, Crabtree will hear his name called early.  If the guy ran a 4.7 he would still be a playmaker.  The league is littered with track star wideouts who ran their way straight out of the NFL.  Receivers who live on a highlight reel don’t end up in the trash bin.

Vs.

Physical Freak:  Darrius Heyward Bey, WR, Maryland – Which brings us to our next prospect.  No one came close to combining the speed and size that Heyward Bey displayed in Indianapolis.  After blazing through a 4.30 40 on the notoriously slow combine surface, DHB likely has a marriage proposal coming from the Raiders.  Or, at the very least, a promise ring.  It honestly wouldn’t surprise me if he came off the board with the seventh pick.  Still, his route running needs refining, and he’s rawer than day old sushi, so he’s not a top ten lock.  But with Al Davis at the helm, who knows?

 

Stats Geek:  Brian Orakpo, DE, Texas Orakpo may be the unquestioned number one defensive end in this draft class, but it’s not because he fits a perfect mold.  At 6-03 260 pounds, he lacks ideal height and has a frame that is likely maxed out weight-wise.  So why is he still so sought after?  It might be those 11 sacks he accumulated as a senior or the 38 career tackles for loss.  Orakpo has the quickness and the drive to become a pass rushing terror in the NFL.  He may not have the same ceiling as Johnson, but there’s less risk involved due to his production.  Sure Alex Boone shut him down in the Fiesta Bowl, but if he ever faces Boone in the pros he better bring a bottle of peppermint Schnapps and a keg of Milwaukee’s Best to level the playing field.  Because, you know, that’s probably what Boone drinks.

Vs.

Physical Freak:  Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech – This guy is the king of physical freaks.  Of course, I wouldn’t call him that to his face.  If you could design a prototypical defensive end, he would look an awful lot like the 6-07 266 pound former yellow jacket.  He’d probably get clocked at under 4.5 seconds in the 40 as well.  There is no denying Johnson’s elite skill set, but scouts are quick to label him an underachiever.  I think inconsistent is a better fit.  17.5 tackles for loss, nine sacks, and seven passes broken up is a strange way to underachieve.  Still, with talent like that, he probably would have had to notch 30 sacks to live up to his hype, and his draft stock will continue to suffer every time someone mutters the word “bust.”  

 

Stats Geek:  Donald Brown, RB, Connecticut – Everyone knows about Donald Brown’s 2000+ yard junior season, but what they don’t know is that he didn’t exactly come out of nowhere.  He put up 1717 rushing yards in the two seasons before he became the best back ever to fall short of qualifying as a Doak Walker Award finalist.  With recent underweight issues raising some heavy question marks about LeSean McCoy, and with Chris Wells’ addiction to injuries, Brown is getting some consideration as the number two back in this class.  His 18 touchdowns in 2008 won’t hurt his stock, and neither will his 21 receptions.  But the fact that he may be too thin to take an NFL pounding keeps him from being a first round lock.

Vs.

Physical Freak:  Andre Brown, RB, North Carolina State – There aren’t many players who have helped themselves as much this offseason as this Brown.  He certainly didn’t do himself any favors during his four years in Raleigh.  In fact, Andre’s four year rushing total is only a few hundred more than Donald’s senior season total.  Strange things can happen at the Senior Bowl though (just ask Robert Ayers, perhaps the most overrated prospect in the draft), and if you show up in Mobile, scouts have a funny habit of forgetting about your Saturday shortcomings.  Brown caught the ball extremely well during the All-Star game, and his size (6-00 224) is an attractive draw when coupled with his 4.49 combine 40.  Just beware scouts.  Guys like Andre and Ayers may have been impressive for one week, but they were nothing but average for four years.

Hunter Ansley runs www.draftzoo.com