2009 Chick-Fil-A Bowl
Virginia Tech (9-3) vs. Tennessee (7-5)
Atlanta, GA, Dec. 31, 7:30 pm, ESPN
Scroll Down For Bowl Histories & Best Moments
- Free Expert Football Predictions
For This Game
-
Get Tickets For
The Chick-fil-A Bowl
Team Pages and 2009 Season
Tennessee | Virginia Tech
 |
-
2008 CFN
Chick-fil-A Bowl Preview
- 2007 CFN Chick-fil-A
Bowl Preview
-
2006 CFN Chick-fil-A Bowl Preview |
|
National Rankings
|
|
T |
|
VT |
|
48th |
Total Offense |
55th |
|
18th |
Total Defense |
14th |
|
32nd |
Scoring Offense |
28th |
|
26th |
Scoring Defense |
11th |
|
43rd |
Rushing Offense |
15th |
|
58th |
Run Defense |
52nd |
|
47th |
Passing Offense |
98th |
|
10th |
Passing Defense |
6th |
|
41st |
Turnover Margin |
16th |
|
Position Ratings
relative to each
other |
|
T |
5 highest
1 lowest |
VT |
|
3.5 |
Quarterbacks |
4 |
|
4.5 |
RBs |
5 |
|
3.5 |
Receivers |
3 |
|
3 |
O Line |
4 |
|
5 |
D Line |
4 |
|
4 |
Linebackers |
3 |
|
5 |
Secondary |
4.5 |
|
4 |
Spec
Teams |
4.5 |
|
4 |
Coaching |
4.5 |
|
|
Chick-fil-A Bowl History |
| 2008 |
LSU 38, Georgia Tech 3 |
| 2007 |
Auburn 23, Clemson 20 OT |
| 2006 |
Georgia 31, Virginia Tech 24 |
| 2005 |
LSU 40, Miami 3 |
| 2004 (Dec.) |
Miami 27, Florida 10 |
| 2004 (Jan.) |
Clemson 27, Tennessee 14 |
| 2002 |
Maryland 30, Tennessee 3 |
| 2001 |
North Carolina 16, Auburn 10 |
| 2000 |
LSU 28, Georgia Tech 14 |
| 1999 |
Miss State 17, Clemson 7 |
| 1998 (Dec.) |
Georgia 35, Virginia 33 |
| 1998 (Jan.) |
Auburn 21, Clemson 17 |
| 1996 |
LSU 10, Clemson 7 |
| 1995 (Dec.) |
Virginia 34, Georgia 27 |
| 1995 (Jan.) |
NC State 28, Mississippi
State 24 |
| 1993 (Dec.) |
Clemson 14, Kentucky 13 |
| 1993 (Jan.) |
North Carolina 21,
Mississippi State 24 |
| 1992 |
East Carolina 37, NC State
34 |
| 1990 |
Auburn 27, Indiana 23 |
| 1989 |
Syracuse 19, Georgia 18 |
| 1988 (Dec.) |
NC State 28, Iowa 23 |
| 1988 (Jan.) |
Tennessee 27, Indiana 22 |
| 1986 |
Virginia Tech 25, NC State
24 |
| 1985 |
Army 31, Illinois 29 |
| 1984 |
Virginia 27, Purdue 24 |
| 1983 |
Florida State 28, North
Carolina 3 |
| 1982 |
Iowa 28, Tennessee 22 |
| 1981 (Dec.) |
West Virginia 26, Florida 6 |
| 1981 (Jan.) |
Miami 20, Virginia Tech 10 |
| 1979 |
Baylor 24, Clemson 18 |
| 1978 |
Purdue 41, Georgia Tech 21 |
| 1977 |
NC State 24, Iowa State 14 |
| 1976 |
Kentucky 21, North Carolina
0 |
| 1975 |
West Virginia 13, NC State
10 |
| 1974 |
Texas Tech 6, Vanderbilt 6 |
| 1973 |
Georgia 17, Maryland 16 |
| 1972 |
NC State 49, West Virginia
13 |
| 1971 |
Mississippi 41, Georgia Tech
18 |
| 1970 |
Arizona State 48, North
Carolina 26 |
| 1969 |
West Virginia 14, South
Carolina 3 |
| 1968 |
LSU 31, Florida State 27 |
dddd
|
Alright, ACC, it’s time to show a little something.
The conference has been on the verge of doing big things ever since it raided the Big East for most of its best programs, but getting over the hump has been hard. Every time it seems like the basketball power league is about to make a big statement or a big move, something happens (like Georgia Tech and Clemson losing to mediocre Georgia and South Carolina teams, respectively) to bring everything back down with a crash. Virginia Tech has been one of the biggest problems.
When a league’s top team struggles in the big games, the entire conference gets a bad rap. Witness the punching bag that has become the Big Ten because of Ohio State’s recent woes in BCS games. It’s not like the Hokies have been bad, far from it, with four straight ten-win seasons and a chance for a fifth, but they’ve struggled in the really big bowl games, lost to Alabama to start this season (although it was a battle), and needed a near-miracle to get past Nebraska at home. Yeah, they beat Cincinnati in last year’s Orange Bowl to get over a big bowl slump, but that was greeted with a collective yawn. It was Cincinnati … whatever.
Beating Tennessee wouldn’t be like beating Florida or Alabama, but a loss would give more ammo to the SEC fans to use in the my-conference-is-better-than-your-conference debate. The Vols are average and certainly weren’t among the SEC’s elite, while it could be argued that Virginia Tech really is the ACC’s best teams. In the streakiest of bowls, the ACC won four straight in the early 1990s, the SEC won five straight from 1996 to 2000, the ACC got back on a roll with four straight wins, and now the SEC is currently holding a four-game winning streak including a Virginia Tech loss to Georgia in the 2006 game. But a Tennessee win would mean more than just keeping a good run alive; it would make the first year under Lane Kiffin a major success and could show just how strong the sleeping superpower might be.
Considering all the problems of the last few seasons and the mediocrity that set in, going 7-5 in a true rebuilding year isn’t bad. And the season was better than it might appear in the record books with a near-miss loss at Alabama, who needed two blocked field goals to save the dream season, a good fight in a 23-13 loss at Florida, and a four-point loss to Auburn. The home gack against UCLA can be chalked up to it being the second game of the season and the offense not quite knowing what it was doing, but there was a 42-17 blasting from Dexter McCluster and Ole Miss that wasn’t pretty.
Kiffin and his staff have been able to get the passing attack back on track, got a nice year out of the defense, a great year from the O line, and were able to pull off a blowout over Georgia and an overtime win over Kentucky on the way to seven wins. This isn’t a perfect team by any stretch, but it’s athletic, has strong potential, and has nothing to lose. This is gravy time in Tennessee; a win would the season on a high note while a loss wouldn’t be a shocker showing how the team needs to mature a bit more and needs to keep building. On the other side, a loss for Virginia Tech could be an indictment.
Virginia Tech might be the best team not in the BCS. The Hokies gave Bama all it could handle in the season opener, played in the Georgia Dome, lost the most important ACC game of the season at Georgia Tech in a 28-23 fight, and fumbled away a heartbreaking loss to North Carolina that should’ve gone the other way. The Hokies destroyed Miami, rallied to beat Nebraska, beat the eventual Conference USA champion, East Carolina, on the road without a problem, and ripped up Boston College. If Virginia Tech can’t beat Tennessee, or a mid-range SEC team, this year, when will it?
The Chick-fil-A, a.k.a. the Peach, has a recent history of being a total and complete dud, with five of the last seven games being decided by 13 points or more with three total annihilations including last year’s 38-3 LSU win over Georgia Tech, 2005’s 40-3 LSU win over Miami, and 2002’s 30-3 Maryland win over Tennessee. If this is going to be a blowout it’ll likely be a Virginia Tech romp, but Tennessee under Kiffin has turned into a wild-card. It’s the last college football game of 2009 and caps off a big day of games. It might not turn out to be the best of the lot, but it’ll be a game that’ll be talked about throughout the offseason no matter what happens.
Players to Watch: Why wasn’t Ryan Williams in the Heisman race? The Hokie freshman had to do more to carry his team than Mark Ingram did, he outgained the Heisman winner 128 yards per game to 119 and 19 touchdowns to 15, and he only ran for four fewer yards despite playing one fewer game. When 2008 star, Darren Evans, went down for the year with a knee injury in a preseason practice, Williams quickly took over with two touchdowns against Alabama and a run of nine 100-yard games in 11. More than the consistency, he got better as the year went on finishing off with four touchdown against NC State and 183 yards and four scores against Virginia. While he’s not nearly as fast as Mississippi’s Dexter McCluster, he’s the type of speedy, quick-cutting back who gives the Vols fits. Tech will mix up its running formations, but it’ll be Williams who’s the focal point of the attack no matter what.
Needing to be a key run-stopper when Williams finds the crease, and needing to be a spy on whatever Tech QB Tyrod Taylor is doing will be Eric Berry, the Thorpe Award winner and one of the best safeties in college football this decade. Taylor has to know where he is at all times and has to throw to whatever area he’s not in. Berry isn’t just a master of baiting quarterbacks into ill-timed throws; he’s also fantastic with the ball in his hands and a threat to take any interception all the way. But in this game, his main job will be to keep Williams and Taylor from making good runs into great runs. Tennessee will take its chances against Taylor’s arm and the Tech passing game, but it’s going to sell out against the run and that means Berry will have to be one of the game’s most productive playmakers.
Offensively for the Vols, everything revolves around the type of game that senior Montario Hardesty can come up with. QB Jonathan Crompton turned in a good year and stopped making a slew of mistakes, but that was partly because Hardesty carried the workload of the offensive production. Extremely quietly, considering Ingram won the Heisman, Hardesty came up with a terrific 1,306-yard, 12-touchdown season and took on even more work over the final two games carrying the ball 32 times for 171 yards and a score against Vanderbilt and 39 times for 179 yards and three touchdowns in the key regular-season finale against Kentucky. There might not be a lot of flash and dash in Hardesty’s runs in this game, but he has the potential to plow his way to a big game to keep the chains moving and give Crompton more opportunity to work. That’s why …
Virginia Tech will win if ... it’s able to keep Hardesty to well under 100 yards. Hardesty ran for just 60 yards against Memphis, but that’s because he wasn’t needed much in the easy win, and let’s not count the 97-yard day in the blowout over Georgia; he would’ve hit the 100-yard mark if needed. Tennessee is 5-0 this year when Hardesty runs for 100 yards or more and 2-5 when he’s under. Florida kept him to 96 yards, and the game was close, but Ole Miss only gave up 55 yards as Tennessee had to start throwing after getting blown out. Virginia Tech has a very nice, very unappreciated set of linebackers that need to focus fully on stopping Hardesty early. That’s easier said than done against a good Tennessee line that will pound away with its big line, but if the Hokie run defense that has had problems at times can make Tennessee start throwing, that plays into the hands of a good secondary that should be able to hold its own against the Vol receiving corps.
Tennessee will win if ... this game becomes all about Tyrod Taylor. Williams has yet to be shut down cold by anyone, but with a few weeks to prepare and a tremendous coaching staff that will be able to find the weakness to attack, expect the Vols to bring everyone and Smokey to focus on Williams and keeping him from coming up with a big game. That’s easier said than done, everyone tries to do that, but Tennessee has the defensive tackles to stuff everything inside and the linebackers to keep the big runs to a minimum. Taylor has become a more-than-competent passer and he has shown a flair for dramatic. When forced to throw, he has come through time and again this year with 268 yards and three scores against Maryland, 327 yards and two touchdowns against Duke, and on the year throwing 13 touchdown passes with just four interceptions. However, the Tennessee secondary is far better than the Virginia Tech receiving corps and will win the game if this comes down to the Hokie passing game vs. a pass defense that’s eighth in the nation in pass efficiency D and tenth in yards allowed. The key to all of this is Dan Williams, the fantastic Tennessee defensive tackle. If he’s having a big game, everything else will fall into place.
What will happen: Chalk this one up for the Tennessee assistant coaches. Virginia Tech isn’t as one-dimensional offensively as it might appear and is even more balanced stat-wise than Tennessee, but it can’t win this game if it doesn’t run well. Crompton isn’t Peyton Manning, but if given time he’ll carve up a Virginia Tech secondary that faced three quarterbacks who can throw (Duke’s Thaddeus Lewis, NC State’s Russell Wilson, and Miami’s Jacory Harris) and had problems with two of them (Lewis and Wilson). Crompton won’t put up big numbers, but he’ll have an efficient day and will end up winning the MVP honors, while the Vol coaching staff will have drilled into the linebackers the importance of reading Williams’ cutbacks.
CFN Prediction: Tennessee 23 … Virginia Tech 17 ... Line: Virginia Tech -5
-
Free Expert Football Predictions For This Game
-
Get Tickets For
The Chick-fil-A Bowl
Best Hokie Bowl Moment:
Meeting Florida State for the national championship in the 2000 Sugar Bowl was quite an accomplishment, but whooping a one-loss Texas team in the 1995 game was even better. Led by big plays from receiver Bryan Still and an attacking defense, the Big East champs won their tenth straight game, earning a second helping of national respect.
Best Volunteer Bowl Moment: UT’s postseason resume is comprised of 30 New Year’s Day bowl games, including seven Sugar Bowls, six Cotton Bowls, four Orange Bowls, three Fiesta Bowls, and two Rose Bowls. Your dad and granddad might disagree, but none was more significant than the 1999 Fiesta Bowl, which guaranteed the Vols their second national championship. Big days from Tee Martin and Peerless Price catapulted Tennessee to a 23-16 win over Florida State in the maiden BCS championship game.
Virginia Tech Bowl History
(8-14)
|
2009 |
Orange |
Virginia Tech 20, Cincinnati 7 |
|
2007 |
Orange |
Kansas 24, Virginia
Tech 21 |
|
2006 |
Chick-fil-A |
Georgia 31, Virginia
Tech 24 |
|
2005 |
Gator |
Virginia Tech 35,
Louisville 24 |
|
2004 |
Sugar |
Auburn 16, Virginia Tech
13 |
|
2003 |
Insight |
California 52, Virginia
Tech 49 |
|
2002 |
San Francisco |
Virginia Tech 20, Air
Force 13 |
|
2001 |
Gator |
Florida State 30,
Virginia Tech 17 |
|
2000 |
Gator |
Virginia Tech 41,
Clemson 20 |
|
1999 |
Sugar |
Florida State 46,
Virginia Tech 29 |
|
1998 |
Music City |
Virginia Tech 38,
Alabama 17 |
|
1997 |
Gator |
North Carolina 42,
Virginia Tech 3 |
|
1996 |
Orange |
Nebraska 41, Virginia
Tech 21 |
|
1995 |
Sugar |
Virginia Tech 28, Texas
10 |
|
1994 |
Gator |
Tennessee 45, Virginia
Tech 23 |
|
1993 |
Independence |
Virginia Tech 45,
Indiana 20 |
|
1986 |
Peach |
Virginia Tech 25, N.C.
State 24 |
|
1984 |
Independence |
Air Force 23, Virginia
Tech 7 |
|
1981 |
Peach |
Miami 20, Virginia Tech
10 |
|
1968 |
Liberty |
Ole Miss 34, Virginia
Tech 17 |
|
1966 |
Liberty |
Miami 14, Virginia Tech
7 |
|
1946 |
Sun |
Cincinnati 18, Virginia
Tech 6 |
|
Tennessee Bowl
History (25-22)
|
2008 |
Outback |
Tennessee 21, Wisconsin 17 |
|
2007 |
Outback |
Penn St 20, Tennessee 10 |
|
2005 |
Cotton |
Tennessee 38, Texas A&M
7 |
|
2003 |
Peach |
Clemson 27, Tennessee 14 |
|
2002 |
Peach |
Maryland 30, Tennessee 3 |
|
2001 |
Citrus |
Tennessee 45, Michigan
17 |
|
2000 |
Cotton |
Kansas St 35, Tennessee
21 |
|
1999 |
Fiesta |
Nebraska 31, Tennessee
21 |
|
1998 |
Fiesta |
Tennessee 23, Florida St
16 |
|
1997 |
Orange |
Nebraska 42, Tennessee
17 |
|
1996 |
Citrus |
Tennessee 48,
Northwestern 28 |
|
1995 |
Citrus |
Tennessee 20, Ohio St 14 |
|
1994 |
Gator |
Tennessee 45, Virginia
Tech 23 |
|
1993 |
Citrus |
Penn State 31, Tennessee
13 |
|
1992 |
Hall of Fame |
Tennessee 38, Boston
College 23 |
|
1991 |
Fiesta |
Penn State 42, Tennessee
17 |
|
1990 |
Sugar |
Tennessee 23, Virginia
22 |
|
1989 |
Cotton |
Tennessee 31, Arkansas
27 |
|
1988 |
Peach |
Tennessee 27, Indiana 22 |
|
1986 |
Liberty |
Tennessee 21, Minnesota
14 |
|
1985 |
Sugar |
Tennessee 35, Miami 7 |
|
1984 |
Sun |
Maryland 27, Tennessee
26 |
|
1983 |
Citrus |
Tennessee 30, Maryland
23 |
|
1982 |
Peach |
Iowa 28, Tennessee 22 |
|
1981 |
Garden State |
Tennessee 28, Wisconsin
21 |
|
1979 |
Bluebonnet |
Purdue 27, Tennessee 22 |
|
1974 |
Liberty |
Tennessee 7, Maryland 3 |
|
1973 |
Gator |
Texas Tech 28, Tennessee
19 |
|
1972 |
Bluebonnet |
Tennessee 24, LSU 17 |
|
1971 |
Liberty |
Tennessee 14, Arkansas
13 |
|
1970 |
Sugar |
Tennessee 34, Air Force
13 |
|
1969 |
Gator |
Florida 14, Tennessee 13 |
|
1968 |
Cotton |
Texas 36, Tennessee 13 |
|
1967 |
Orange |
Oklahoma 26, Tennessee
24 |
|
1966 |
Gator |
Tennessee 18, Syracuse
12 |
|
1965 |
Bluebonnet |
Tennessee 27, Tulsa 6 |
|
1957 |
Gator |
Tennessee 3, Texas A&M 0 |
|
1956 |
Sugar |
Baylor 13, Tennessee 7 |
|
1952 |
Cotton |
Texas 16, Tennessee 0 |
|
1951 |
Sugar |
Maryland 28, Tennessee
13 |
|
1950 |
Cotton |
Tennessee 20, Texas 14 |
|
1946 |
Orange |
Rice 8, Tennessee 0 |
|
1944 |
Rose |
USC 25, Tennessee 0 |
|
1942 |
Sugar |
Tennessee 14, Tulsa 7 |
|
1940 |
Sugar |
Boston College 19,
Tennessee 13 |
|
1939 |
Rose |
USC 14, Tennessee 0 |
|
1938 |
Orange |
Tennessee, 17, Oklahoma
0 |
|