|
|
|
2010 CFN Preview - Unit Rankings, WRs
|
|
|

Texas A&M WR Jeff Fuller
|
|
|
CollegeFootballNews.com Posted Aug 16, 2010
|
|
CFN 2010 Preview Unit Rankings from top to bottom - Receivers
|
Preview 2010 -
Unit Rankings
Receivers
2010 CFN Preseason Rankings
-
1 to 5 |
6 to 10 |
11 to 20 |
21 to 30 |
31 to 40 |
41 to 50 |
51 to 60
- 61 to 70 |
71 to 80 |
81 to 90 |
91 to 100 |
101 to 110 |
111 to 120
- CFN Preseason Rankings 2009 |
2008 |
2007
-
Receive FREE selections, Free Weekly Newsletters and much more from
ATS Consultants
-
Get Tickets For Your Team, Any Game
CFN 2010 Unit Rankings
- Offenses |
Quarterbacks |
Running
Backs |
Receivers
| Offensive Lines
- Defenses |
Defensive Lines |
Linebackers |
Secondaries
|
Special
Teams
1. Texas A&M
Loaded. Jeff Fuller has All-America potential, Uzoma Nwachukwu is an elite playmaker, and Ryan Swope is one of the league’s fastest players. Throw in Ryan Tannehill, the backup quarterback who led the team in catches, and a boatload of depth, and this is a dangerous effective group that will make big play after big play after big play. Getting down the field isn’t a problem with home run hitters all across the board.
2. Arkansas
Considering Arkansas was 112th in the nation in passing in 2007, things have made a total about-face. With three great starters in Joe Adams, Greg Childs, and Jairus Wright, and with an All-America tight end in D.J. Williams, the Hogs are loaded. The top five receivers from last year are back and they’re all fast, they can all produce, and they should all go ballistic with Ryan Mallett throwing for them.
3. Notre Dame
The receiving corps has two superstars in Malcolm Floyd and TE Kyle Rudolph, emerging stars in
Theo Reddick and Tailer Jones, and the experience and talent to make the quarterbacks look great. As long as
QB Dayne Crist gets time to throw, the receivers will blow up and quickly make up for the loss of
Golden Tate.
Floyd will end up being drafted in the top 50, Rudolph might be the first tight end off the board, and
Duval Kamara is about to blossom now that he gets to play on the outside, but it was Jones who had the coaching staff raving. He might be the third or fourth option to start the season, but he’s going to be special.
4. San Diego State
As long as Vincent Brown and DeMarco Sampson are on the field, SDSU should have a fighting chance against anyone. The two form a deadly receiving tandem and should combine for well over 120 catches. The depth is decent and the tight ends should be bigger factors. Brown and Sampson could end up each earning All-Mountain West honors, while Dominique Sandifer might fly under the radar as a very, very dangerous No. 3 target. He’s a home run hitter who should be a difference maker on at least two really big plays.
5. Alabama
If the Alabama starters played for anyone with a high powered passing game (like Arkansas), they’d be
given more respect. Talent-wise, this group can hang with anyone and there will be two or three times this year when some secondary is caught napping and gets lit up like a Christmas tree. Everyone knows their place, but
Julio Jones is too good to not get the ball more, and Marquis Maze and
Darius Hanks are far too dangerous to not have plays designed for them.
6. Houston
Two years ago, Houston was putting out APBs for quality receivers to catch Case Keenum’s darts. Today, through good recruiting and player development, the staff has cobbled together one of the most dangerous pass-catching ensembles in America. It can beat you in a number of different ways, and in James Cleveland, now has a legitimate next-level player running routes.
One returning all-star is a blessing. Three is an embarrassment
of riches. By retaining Cleveland, Tyron Carrier, and Patrick
Edwards, Houston can challenge any opponent horizontally and
vertically. If one receiver is having a rough day, there are at
least two others able to pick up the slack.
7. Cincinnati
It says a lot about this group that it can lose an all-star in Mardy Gilyard and still be among the nation’s most dangerous. Armon Binns is next-level, D.J. Woods is vastly underrated, and Ben Guidugli is a playmaking tight end. If Vidal Hazelton, Marcus Barnett, or Jamar Howard realizes their potential, there won’t be enough passes to keep everyone happy. There’s size, speed, and experience, a combination that’ll keep the passing game from experiencing any noticeable drop-off.
8. Wisconsin
Ultra-efficient last year, the UW passing game should be even better and even more explosive with Kyle Jefferson back in the mix, a great athlete in tight end Lance Kendricks to take over at tight end, a fun toy in David Gilreath to use in a variety of ways, and an all-star caliber duo in Nick Toon and Isaac Anderson. The receiving corps is loaded.
9. Texas Tech
The receiving corps seemed to be able to go on despite losing Michael Crabtree early to the NFL, and now the team is loaded with weapons. Three starters return, and
Lyle Leong might as well be considered a fourth starter considering how big a part of the offense he was. There might not be any one superstar who’ll earn All-America honors, but
Alex Torres and Detron Lewis could be anyone’s top twosome and there’s a slew of great veterans who can step up and produce at any time.
10. Boise State
As long as Austin Pettis and Titus Young are on the field, the receiving corps will be deadly. The complementary targets are going to be terrific with all the attention paid to the two stars, while the tight ends will blossom once again with both Kyle Efaw and Tommy Gallarda able to come up with big plays. They’ll make Kellen Moore look great, and vice versa.
COULD EASILY BE IN TOP TEN
|
Auburn |
SEC |
|
Florida |
SEC |
|
Georgia |
SEC |
|
Indiana |
Big Ten |
|
Iowa |
Big Ten |
|
LSU |
SEC |
|
Miami |
ACC |
|
NC State |
ACC |
|
Ohio State |
Big Ten |
|
Oklahoma |
Big 12 |
|
Oregon State |
Pac 10 |
|
Penn State |
Big Ten |
|
Purdue |
Big Ten |
|
Stanford |
Pac 10 |
|
TCU |
M-West |
|
Tennessee |
SEC |
|
Texas |
Big 12 |
|
Tulsa |
C-USAW |
|
Wake Forest |
ACC |
|
Washington |
Pac 10 |
SOLID, WILL BE A POSITIVE
|
Arizona |
Pac
10 |
|
BYU |
M-West |
|
California |
Pac 10 |
|
Colorado |
Big 12 |
|
Duke |
ACC |
|
Florida State |
ACC |
|
Fresno State |
WAC |
|
Hawaii |
WAC |
|
Kentucky |
SEC |
|
Maryland |
ACC |
|
Michigan |
Big Ten |
|
Michigan State |
Big Ten |
|
Mississippi State |
SEC |
|
Missouri |
Big 12 |
|
Nebraska |
Big 12 |
|
North Carolina |
ACC |
|
Oklahoma State |
Big 12 |
|
Ole Miss |
SEC |
|
Oregon |
Pac 10 |
|
Pitt |
Big East |
|
Rutgers |
Big East |
|
SMU |
C-USAW |
|
South Carolina |
SEC |
|
South Florida |
Big East |
|
UCLA |
Pac 10 |
|
USC |
Pac 10 |
|
Virginia Tech |
ACC |
|
West Virginia |
Big East |
|
Western Michigan |
MAC |
AVERAGE
|
Arizona State |
Pac
10 |
|
Ball State |
MAC |
|
Baylor |
Big 12 |
|
Boston College |
ACC |
|
Clemson |
ACC |
|
Connecticut |
Big East |
|
FIU |
Sun Belt |
|
Georgia Tech |
ACC |
|
Idaho |
WAC |
|
Illinois |
Big Ten |
|
Iowa State |
Big 12 |
|
Kansas |
Big 12 |
|
Kansas State |
Big 12 |
|
Louisiana Tech |
WAC |
|
Louisville |
Big East |
|
Miami Univ. |
MAC |
|
Minnesota |
Big Ten |
|
Nevada |
WAC |
|
North Texas |
Sun Belt |
|
Northwestern |
Big Ten |
|
Ohio |
MAC |
|
San Jose State |
WAC |
|
Southern Miss |
C-USAE |
|
Syracuse |
Big East |
|
Toledo |
MAC |
|
Troy |
Sun Belt |
|
UAB |
C-USAE |
|
UCF |
C-USAE |
|
UNLV |
M-West |
|
Utah |
M-West |
|
UTEP |
C-USAW |
|
Virginia |
ACC |
|
Washington State |
Pac 10 |
NEEDS WORK
|
Akron |
MAC |
|
Bowling Green |
MAC |
|
East Carolina |
C-USAE |
|
Marshall |
C-USAE |
|
Vanderbilt |
SEC |
A PROBLEM
|
Air Force |
M-West |
|
Buffalo |
MAC |
|
Central Michigan |
MAC |
|
Colorado State |
M-West |
|
Kent State |
MAC |
|
Memphis |
C-USAE |
|
New Mexico |
M-West |
|
Northern Illinois |
MAC |
|
Rice |
C-USAW |
|
Temple |
MAC |
|
UL Monroe |
Sun Belt |
|
Utah State |
WAC |
|
Wyoming |
M-West |
THE BOTTOM TEN
|
Arkansas State |
Sun
Belt |
|
Army |
Ind |
|
Eastern Michigan |
MAC |
|
Florida Atlantic |
Sun Belt |
|
Middle Tennessee |
Sun Belt |
|
Navy |
Ind |
|
New Mexico State |
WAC |
|
Tulane |
C-USAW |
|
UL Lafayette |
Sun Belt |
|
Western Kentucky |
Sun Belt |
CFN 2010 Unit Rankings
- Offenses |
Quarterbacks |
Running
Backs |
Receivers
| Offensive Lines
- Defenses |
Defensive Lines |
Linebackers |
Secondaries
|
Special
Teams
2010 CFN Preseason Rankings
-
1 to 5 |
6 to 10 |
11 to 20 |
21 to 30 |
31 to 40 |
41 to 50 |
51 to 60
- 61 to 70 |
71 to 80 |
81 to 90 |
91 to 100 |
101 to 110 |
111 to 120
- CFN Preseason Rankings 2009 |
2008 |
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|